Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberty2004
" "No religious Test" meant you didn't need to have membership in any established denomination in order to hold public office. Period. Good point."

Um, if the founding fathers wanted to say no denomination test they would have said no denomination test. But the fact is they chose SPECIFIC language to convey a SPECIFIC point. RELIGOUS tests were not to be administered means just what is says, it protects all religions. You can rationalize your unwarranted contempt for a group of people all you want, just don't juxtapose your beliefs on to the founding fathers intentions.
111 posted on 05/03/2005 5:08:47 PM PDT by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Ksnavely
y no denomination test they would have said no denomination test. But the fact is they chose SPECIFIC language to convey a SPECIFIC point. RELIGOUS tests were not to be administered means just what is says, it protects all religions. You can rationalize your unwarranted contempt for a group of people all you want, just don't juxtapose your beliefs on to the founding fathers intentions.

I have read many of the Founders works and I was NOT juxtaposing my beliefs with the Founders. And what's this CR*P about unwarranted contempt? Get a life.

244 posted on 05/03/2005 9:22:33 PM PDT by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson