Posted on 05/03/2005 11:33:07 AM PDT by Bob J
Apparently all of you post without reading the article.
Bump.
I sue Yahoo = I use Yahoo
I guess you were brilliant enough to figure that out.
You would think a competitor like Yahoo would jump all over this.
"Are you only getting 1/2 of the world? Do you feel someone is keeping secrets from you?
Google censors their search results, we let you see the whole world..."
Lexis-Nexis, but it'll cost ya.
It is plauged by leftist poop.
How does that work? Does whether the holocaust or moon landing actually happened depend on what day you look it up and who got in the last update?
Well .. we don't know what's going on behind the scenes now do we ..?
I think Yahoo is pretty savey - so competition being what it is .. I'm hoping Yahoo will surprise us and open up that race to be first - and start including conservatives - WHO JUST HAPPEN TO USE THE INTERNET MORE THAN LIBERALS.
YoooHooo .. YAHOO .. are you paying attention ..??
in my opinion, yep, that about sums it up, also pay attention to where they attribute their findings
Mike Medved dedicated the third hour of his show today on Google.com not accepting conservative ads.
Cool. I'm gonna go back and change the 1992 elections. I think Pat Buchanan made a fine president.
I've been wondering about google. Certain searches didn't seem to add up in some ways. Maybe Drudge's search engine is better?
The "Wiki" system that Wikipedia (the largest-scale example) uses allows people with permission (in the case of Wikipedia, everyone has permission) to edit articles as they see fit. It archives older versions of articles as well, so that articles that are screwed with maliciously can be repaired instantly. The idea is that everyone fixes each other's mistakes and can write articles that focus even on the most obscure topics... There are 300,000 entries in Wikipedia for this reason. There is certainly nothing suspicious about Wikipedia, but it's true that people with a bias or prejudice may write Wiki articles as such. That, of course, is why anyone can fix this mistake. You're expected to write professionally.
it suits the liberals, that is all its good for
I'm not sure I know what you mean... Why don't you elaborate on that?
BTW, that's an urban legend. I looked it up on snopes.
Google's bias is showing!
Prior to going public there was a Wired article on the founders of Google. If I recall correctly, all you will ever need to know about their worldview was in the article. Particularly interesting was how they bend over for the Chinese government so that they will not be banned in China. If the comutards don;t like it, it will die a quick death on the Chinese version of Google.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.