Actually, she is on the record as wanting an abortion, and being darn firm in that conviction. Whatever she said she'd do if the pregancy wasn't terminated was at best an honest second choice, but was more likely designed to get anybody who objected to her decision to "give into" her way.
The fact that this was before a trial judge, and a decision was rendered by a trial judge, still has me puzzled. Florida case law is crystal clear. Last I heard, the trial judge was awaiting a ruling from the appeals court, as to whether ANY court had business in this case.
Exactly. Going against the law and blocking this girl's right to decide would be judicial activism which I thought we were against. Oh, but if we don't like the rules I guess we can change them in the middle of the game.