Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
Then you shouldn't really have any problem with Christians who want to prohibit murder in all cases.

In all cases? Killing someone in self-defense is technically murder, but we have decided to remove such killing from the legal definition.

In the case of abortion, there is the added argument of whether or not a fetus is a human being.

If you want to be an absolutist on murder, I have no problem with that. But you aren't. You draw the line at a different place than people who are pro-choice, but you draw the line nonetheless.

637 posted on 05/06/2005 11:09:55 AM PDT by Modernman ("Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 632 | View Replies ]


To: Modernman
In all cases? Killing someone in self-defense is technically murder, but we have decided to remove such killing from the legal definition.

It's technically "homocide." "Murder" is a legal term and is defined by the laws. Generally it means the unjustified killing of another. Dictionary.com says "an unlawful killing." Self-defense is a legitimate justification.

Homocide is not always wrong. Murder is.

In the case of abortion, there is the added argument of whether or not a fetus is a human being.

That's a losing argument. I am more respectful of those who acknowledge that it is a human life, but that it enjoys fewer protections than a more-developed life.

SD

644 posted on 05/06/2005 11:15:03 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson