Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bushforlife

One thing the article doesn't state is what form of contraception is being sought, which makes me think perhaps it is the "Plan B" morning after pill or RU 486, not the pill most folks think of as apprpriate for contraception and other regulating effects. I am not for any of them, but given the recent up tick in stories about pharmacists refusing to fill contraception prescriptions, I think they must be sweetening the pot with some of these early abortion pills.


23 posted on 05/03/2005 7:14:48 AM PDT by Nora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Nora

In Illinois, PP is giving EC out like candy at parties.

See StraightupwithSherri on blogsforterri.com or prolifeblogs.com


145 posted on 05/03/2005 9:36:41 AM PDT by Lesforlife ("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb . . ." Psalm 139:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Nora
Freepers are supposed to ask questions, think critically about MSM news reports. By now you should all be aware that there is a concerted campaign by PP to make abortion available via non-surgical methods. Their MO is to refer to everything as "contraception." The pharmacists who are objecting in most cases are objecting to the morning after pill, which is abortifacient. But the MSM then, based on PP press releases, spins this as opposition to contraception. PP is very cleverly playing on the split among pro-life Christians between those who oppose both contraception and abortion and those who accept contraception but oppose abortion. By labeling abortifacients as contraceptives, they are sneaking under the radar of those who embrace contraception but oppose abortion.

Wake up. Stop pointificating about the mean old pharmacists until you've learned what the real deal is here.

PP is very clever. They have alredy redefined pregnancy as not beginning until implantation. If they had their way this would be the only definition permitted in medical schools and in the culture in general. That's how they can justify calling the morning after pill "contraception" rather than "abortifacient."

Moral of the story, when you see the word "contraception" you should immediately suspect that it means at least to some degree abortifacient until you have solid evidence to the contrary.

And pro-lifers need to reconsider the way they've let PP drive a wedge within the pro-life movement by using contraception. They've outsmarted pro-lifers because too many Christians have not really thought through the entire sex/procreation interrelationship.

244 posted on 05/04/2005 6:53:12 AM PDT by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Nora

They could also be presciptions for bc pills, packaged for morning after use.


295 posted on 05/05/2005 9:34:46 AM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson