A North Korean Nuclear Egg Laid (Hillary blames Bush now that it has hatched)

GoGov ^ | April 30, 2004 | Russell Betts

[BJungNan]

Unfortunately, Bush himself did not have any sense during his first debate with Kerry, repeatedly giving the disasterous Clinton-Carter-Albright nuclear welfare plan a complete pass.

That's where someone that is both a good speaker and knows the subject well can effectively deal with a situation like that. We've all had moments when we reflect back and say, I wish I had thought to say that at the time. Bush is just not quick in situations like that.

[stm]

An obvious PhotoShop job by a radical fundie. This could never happen, an American SoS toasting with a communist dictator.

[exDemMom]

He sold US military secrets to the Chinese, not the North Koreans!!

Jimmy Carter went to North Korea and made a deal with them: promise not to build nuclear weapons, and we'll give you everything you need to make them. Kim Il-Jung (or was it Kim Il-Song?) promised. Klintoon sent the equipment. One did not require 20-20 hindsight to see that it was an incredibly stupid and short-sighted deal--it was obvious from the start.

IIRC, helping the Chinese with their missile technology came later.

[FreeReign]

Thursday;

Hillary: "Admiral, let me ask you, do you assess that North Korea has the ability to arm a missile with a nuclear device?”

Admiral Jacoby: "The assessment is that they have the capability to do that, yes ma'am.”

Friday;

Pentagon's chief spokesman, Lawrence Di Rita: "He was not making a new assessment,” “There is no new assessment of North Korea's capability in this regard. And in fact, he was speaking about a theoretical capability to combine missile types and a warhead, such that you could have a theoretical ability to reach the United States, as he described."

Jacoby handed Hillary this supposid "new" piece of information. Well it turns out the capability is still theoretical or not proven. Same assesment as it has been no thanks to the Clinton's and their N.K policy of the 90's. We all know what's wrong with the Clinton's. We all know that it's hypocritical for her to start blaming Bush on this. The question is, what's up with Jacoby??

Link

[FreeReign]

Answering my own question, it appears that Jacoby was taken out of context by Hillary

JACOBY: "Yes. The assessment on a two-stage missile would give, be able to reach portions of U.S. territory, and the projection on a three-stage missile would be that it would be able to reach most of the continental United States. That still is a theoretical capability in the sense that those missiles have not been tested.”

CLINTON: "With all due respect, it is troubling beyond words that we have testimony like that at this time."

[John Lenin]

enuff said

[silverleaf]

Shrillery claims to be "deeply disturbed" over KN missiles' ability to hit the USA...and yet...and yet...

IN 1998, while Shrill's staff was busily ordering up FBI files on fellow US citizens and siccing the IRS on non-FOB's (non friends of Bill)...

IN 1998 while presidue was drying on a certain blue dress...

In 1998 the North Koreans fired a missile extremely close to US soil (Alaska). South Korean sources claimed that one of the North Korean dummy warheads actually landed in Alaska. (Of course, we wouldnt expect any discussion much less verification of that, from John Deutsch or the rest of the Klinton regime's intelligence flunkies.)

Even Senator Robert "Sheets" Byrd had a few words to say about that..
http://www.kimsoft.com/1997/byrd.htm

[BJungNan]

An obvious PhotoShop job by a radical fundie. This could never happen, an American SoS toasting with a communist dictator.

Ahhh, you are good with the punch line. Very good.

[zipper]

Stand by-- the Hermit Kingdom is about to test a nuke underground-- and that will mean they have both the delivery vehicles and viable warheads.

[Chu Gary]

"You'd think Hillary would have enough sense not to highlight the deficiencies in her own husband's record."

You or I would think so, but just ask a female Dimocrat if Hillary is well qualified to be President. Now, in my case, I'm retired and the day that b***h gets the keys to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. is my first day in Mexico or some other country. And, as oposed to the idiots with a (D) after their name, I can afford to do the traveling both money-wise and time-wise.

[Grateful One]

I like your line of thinking. What happens to us when we are young, has a great deal to do with how we shape our worldview. I think liberalism has been around for many years, with different labels applied to it.

I believe in the omnipotence of nature, good or bad, and that we were always meant to be in conflict (war) and struggle. That's how all species survive, including us.

Many liberals are essentially lazy from birth, and consequently do not want adversity in life. Their imaginations lead them to believe that they can create a peacful world through intellectual persuasion (theirs, of course) and "negotiation". They dream of an idyllic paradise where no one has much responsibility or commitment. This is most certainly against nature.

We were meant to be in constant "flight". If not, we begin to collapse. Evidence the deterioration of our country since WWII.

And yes, theirs is a condition that could be corrected early in life, if their cultural environment reflected a more sane understanding of nature's imperatives.

[CPOSharky]

The honorable thing would be a humble admission...

A Clintoon, honorable, humble. or even admission... impossible.

[Search4Truth]

Sanity BUMP!

[Brilliant]

I've thought about moving to Australia if Hillary socializes the health care system. The problem is that they've already got socialized medicine everywhere else. The American conservatives are either going to have to fight to the death here, or they are going to have to reform some other country that is currently a basket case.