The fiance may be found now to have not been entirely truthful about what had gone on in the day or days preceding Tuesday. Were there anxieties expressed, or harsh words exchanged, and he, frightened that harm may have come to her, could not bring himself to being totally honest about those because of his and his family's "status" in the community? He also may share with her a great deal of the blame for allowing the expenditure of people's energy, emotions, and money costs of the past three days by not being totally straightforward about what was going on in their relationship.
Either that, or he was not tuned in to her and her emotional needs, which may help to explain her extremely bizarre actions. His words this morning, as quoted by the minister, while to some in the faith community may sound loving and forgiving, need to be examined in depth to determine exactly what he was saying, and what it might say about his own interpretation of love. If the minister quoted him correctly, what he really did by his words was to label her a "sinner," and himself as the "saint" victim who would "forgive" her.
One thing is certain: this was not solely about the pressures of a "wedding." As a psychologist said on Fox this morning, her actions have more to do with the prospects of a "marriage" (with all that implies) than with the "event" (wedding).
so true
You shootin for the screenplay for the LIFETIME version?