[burzum]

So .. even if you could tie her campaign to some of the fraud of the election - it wouldn't be a recall issue ..?? She would have to commit some illegal act now that she's technically elected ..??

As I discussed before, who would impeach her? The Democrat-controlled state house? Who would find her guilty? The Democrat-controlled state senate? And who would hear her appeals? The Democrat-appointed state supreme court?

To say its an uphill battle is a vast understatement. Republicans should be focused on the 2008 election because they are not going to unseat her.

[CyberAnt]

"who would impeach her?"


Well .. "recall" in not impeachment - which is what I ask.

In CA we have all the same democrats to deal with that you do .. however, we recalled Davis - and we didn't have to "impeach" him to do it.

[Edgewood Pilot]

The tide is turning. Many Democrats realize the election was flawed. I believe history will be made in the next few months by a precedent-setting decision by the good judge in Chelan County.

[goodnesswins]

"Republicans should be focused on the 2008 election because they are not going to unseat her."

Where do YOU live? If we do not UNSEAT her, the problems which got her elected will be alive and well EVERYWHERE....EVERY city/county/state in this nation SHOULD be watching this.....and, by the way, I DO BELIEVE WE WILL UNSEAT HER....I've said it since November. I live in Washington, the State......and you really have to BE here to KNOW what's going on!