Of course, to some misguided FReepers here, -- Wilmshurst has no 2nd Amendment rights in California.
Is that true? I haven't run across anything but a couple of idiots that couldn't find their butts with a flashlight. They generally disappear with any factual debate.
See paulsen's post at #89 for what passes as "factual debate" on the issue.
See paulsen's post at #89
These were rights which the federal government could not violate. The states, of course, were free to do so, provided it didn't violate their respective state constitutions. Examples of this abound.
I see what you mean. This kind of thinking is the reason we had a civil war, was it not? The South wanted to keep slavery among other things and the North abolished it with the Constitution.
He states in this excerp that the States can violate Federal Law.
Totally rediculous. It is completely opposite of what he writes. Looks like a moonbat to me.