Replies

To: ancient_geezer

Maybe it isn't such an outrage on the new FR. -- Only 2 replies from over 60 lurkers..

But ya, -- that judge should be impeached for violating his oath of office.

4 posted on 04/29/2005 5:52:30 PM PDT by P_A_I

"Only 2 replies from over 60 lurkers."How do you know that?RE the article,imo that man has a lawsuit.What's sickening is our tax dollars finance these clowns.

10 posted on 04/29/2005 6:10:44 PM PDT by thombo

12 posted on 04/29/2005 6:12:49 PM PDT by righthand man (WE'RE SOUTHERN AND PROUD OF IT)

Only 2 replies from over 60 lurkers.

All threads don't always get the attention they deserve. This one has a lot to digest for me to jump up and yell "OUTRAGE".

But I did read it and this is my reply.

31 posted on 04/29/2005 6:48:47 PM PDT by Flyer (If I were 8 pixels tall I could fit in my tag line)

Maybe it isn't such an outrage on the new FR. -- Only 2 replies from over 60 lurkers..

You sir, owe us an apology for this snide remark! The story was posted at 5:23, you pissed on our cornflakes at 5:53. Sorry you think we should jump on a thread you think we should read first a mere 30 minutes after it was posted. It is now 9:56 and this is the first I have seen this blinkin story and I'll thank you to keep your insults to yourself!

Perhaps next time you will give your fellow FReepers the benefit of the doubt before spewing horse nuggets toward them.

Oh BTW there are now 63 posts and 414 lurkers and counting. Just in case you give a bull durham! If you are not happy with the clientele, jump on outa here and let those of us who try to be civil conduct debate.

While I am sure we have acquired a number of idiots (what is the total subscription?) and they play insert foot in mouth, overall this is the greatest forum on the web. With this many people you can't possibly think they all are going to think just like you and respond with the speed you think relevant.

68 posted on 04/29/2005 10:08:36 PM PDT by Allosaurs_r_us (for a fee........I'm happy to be........Your BACKDOOR MAN!....Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap!)

Maybe it isn't such an outrage on the new FR. -- Only 2 replies from over 60 lurkers..

This is an official reply, you are free to count it along with the other replies above.

74 posted on 04/29/2005 10:41:27 PM PDT by Petruchio (... .--. .- -.-- / .- -. -.. / -. ..- - . .-. / .. .-.. .-.. . --. .- .-.. ...)

But ya, -- that judge should be impeached for violating his oath of office.

In this case, that judge should be imprisoned for violating his oath of office AND his wilful breach of unalienable Constitutional rights.

154 posted on 05/01/2005 8:16:31 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)

All the judges that refer to international law and take part in judicial activism should be impeached and prosecuted.

174 posted on 05/01/2005 1:56:49 PM PDT by Conservative4Life (Blaming GUNS for crimes is like Blaming SPOONS for Rosies morbid obesity....)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794