[Ken H]

"Marshaling an impressive array of historical evidence, a growing body of scholarly commentary indicates that the "right to keep and bear arms" is, as the Amendment's text suggests, a personal right."

Mr. Justice Clarence Thomas, Printz

[P_A_I]

Ken H wrote:

"Marshaling an impressive array of historical evidence, a growing body of scholarly commentary indicates that the "right to keep and bear arms" is, as the Amendment's text suggests, a personal right."

Mr. Justice Clarence Thomas, Printz


______________________________________



Unfortunately, in that same decision, Thomas goes on to qualify his support:


" -- The Second Amendment similarly appears to contain an express limitation on the government's authority . .
.. This Court has not had recent occasion to consider the nature of the substantive right safeguarded by the Second Amendment.
If, however, the Second Amendment is read to confer a personal right to 'keep and bear arms,' ----- "


Read about how "if however" it "appears" a "substantive" right may exist.
This is not an impressive array of unqualified support for our RKBA's by Thomas.