Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: brothers4thID; wideawake

"These avenging angel crusaders.. would they be the same as those who sacked (Christian) Byzantium?"


Nope, they wouldn't be.... see #39. I'm not saying the crusaders were all angels by any means, but the amount of dishonest propaganda that has been spread about them is truly staggering. The crusaders certainly do not compare badly to many other military ventures of their era, and they certainly aren't ALL-BAD compared to the Islamic armies that slaughtered so many innocents, then and since.

When you get a film like the current Ridley Scott dishonest garbage it can only be properly understood in the present political context as a propaganda blow on behalf of Al Qaeda and other Islamo-fascists.... part of the deranged outlook of the civilization-hating elites.......


64 posted on 04/29/2005 1:33:28 PM PDT by Enchante (Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Enchante
I've studied propaganda from the masters of the art and I seriously doubt this film is anything close to deserving of the name.

And just as all crusaders were not bad, not all members of the Muslim army were bad.
105 posted on 04/29/2005 2:01:21 PM PDT by brothers4thID (I have knocked on door of this man's soul- and found someone home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson