If she had wanted to save the child, she wouldn't have gone to the clinic in the first place. This is disgusting and ignorant at best, on EVERYONE's part.
As a private investigator, I have followed and videotaped numerous people in public places doing a wide variety of things. But when they arrive at their place of residence, or anywhere else where they have a "reasonable expectation of privacy", the video stops rolling.
The way I see it, this woman's claim is baseless, as there is no way she could have had a reasonable expectation that the doctors would do anything to save the life of her baby. After all, she was at an abortion clinic.
While I agree that the subject is great for the anti-abortion argument (and I am pro-life), I don't believe this woman has any right to damages, and should have to live with her actions for the rest of her life. She will ultimately have to answer for her actions.
the claim is no more baseless than many others i've seen. afer the baby was born, there was a reasonable expectation, especially as per the born-infants alive act.
also, the claim has to do with more than saving the baby's life. apparently, there were sanitary issues, etc.
I don't believe this woman has any right to damages
i agree. however, the complaint could still serve the purpose of proving the culpability of the death mill, regulatory violations, etc.