I don't think that he actually agrees to that form of government, because the Mexican government only cares about taking care of the people who have money. President Bush wants to give money to poor people. Gee if he announces Jesus the democrats will fall over dead trying to call for the separation of church and state. Appear to live morally? Hmm, you dont know him very well, do you? Yea, he spends big, so does every politician. He already gave us tax cuts. What do you want? He is not socialist.
correction, the president wants to give OTHER PEOPLE'S money to poor people... in this case MINE. In that aspect... he's a wealth redistributing socialist. Funny that you mentioned poor in Mexico. He seems set on letting them in here carte blanche, contrary to our nation's best interest and immigration law... and the will of the majority of Americans, whilst labelling the patriots who want the law enforced, 'vigilantes'. Disgusting.
WRONG... NOT if he does it to raise support for wealth redistribution, like Jesse Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton.
Being personally moral does not mean one is being moral in taking MONEY from one and giving it to others, after campaigning on the devolution of tax and power from the feds to the states and individuals. In fact, that could be considered LYING... and is arguably JUST as immoral, per se, as getting a quickie hummer in the closet.
And which is what we elected him to NOT DO, because it is what our enemies the socialists aka, democrats have done since FDR and his grand theft 'national' program.
Actually HE did not GIVE us anything. We elected him with the mandate to return what was ours, which he has not done. It is after all, OUR money. And he has not gone to the mat to make the miniscule tax cuts PERMANENT... or any effort to cut them further and do so PERMANENTLY... but he HAS spent a lot more money, at larger rates and increase levels, than his democrat, immoral and redistributionist predecessor... Willie the Sink.
Actualy freeper friend.... he meets the definition very nicely. 'the needs of the many' and "from each according to his ability to each according to his need" are concepts of marx and lennon.
better than lurch. heck yes.
but realistically he is a big spending redistributionist socialism policy maker, superintending the financial collapse of our nation.
You are clearly in denial. But will wake up soon enough, because we are past the event horizon, aka, the point of no return.