 |
|
Posted on 04/27/2005 6:21:34 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
|
|
|
BLAGNAC, France (AP) -- The world's largest passenger plane, the Airbus A380, completed a maiden flight Wednesday that took it over the Pyrenees mountains, a milestone for aviation and for the European aircraft-maker's battle with American rival Boeing Co.
The double-decked, 308-ton plane landed successfully to applause at 2:22 p.m (8:22 a.m. EDT) after a flight of nearly four hours. About 30,000 spectators watched the white plane with blue tail take off and touch down, 101 years after the Wright brothers achieved the first controlled, sustained flight.
Before it landed, its front lights shining, the A380 did a slow flyover above the airport in Blagnac, southwest France, where it had taken off at 10:29 a.m. (4:29 a.m. EDT).
The plane carried a crew of six and 22 tons of on-board test instruments. It can carry as many as 840 passengers on commercial flights.
"The takeoff was absolutely perfect," chief test pilot Jacques Rosay told reporters by radio from the A380 cockpit as he flew at 10,000 feet just north of the Pyrenees mountains, about an hour into the flight. "The weather's wonderful."
The pilots checked the plane's basic handling characteristics while the on-board equipment recorded measurements for 150,000 separate parameters and beamed real-time data back to computers on the ground.
Rosay, co-pilot Claude Lelaie and four fellow crew members took no chances - donning parachutes for the first flight. A handrail inside the test plane lead from the cockpit to an escape door that could have been jettisoned had the pilots lost control.
In Paris, French Cabinet ministers broke into applause when President Jacques Chirac told them of the successful start to the flight. The head of competitor Boeing's French division, Yves Galland, said he watched the televised takeoff and, just this once, "shared the emotion of the people of Airbus."
The flight capped 11 years of preparation and $13 billion in spending.
Orville and Wilbur Wright, by comparison, spent an estimated $1,000 developing their skeletal flyer, which stayed airborne for 12 seconds on the sands of Kill Devil Hills, N.C., the morning of Dec. 17, 1903.
Built of spruce and ash covered with muslin, the Wright brothers' flyer weighed 605 pounds, according to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington.
The A380 weighed 464 tons on takeoff, including its bulky test equipment, fittings and fuel, Airbus said. That is about 75 percent of its maximum authorized takeoff weight for commercial flights.
Spectators camped out by the airport to be there for what some said was Europe's biggest aviation event since the first flight of the supersonic Concorde in 1969. About 30,000 people gathered around the airport to watch, police said.
Emergency services took no chances and stationed fire trucks at regular intervals along the runway, although aviation experts say modern computer modeling and wind-tunnel tests have made maiden flights safer than ever.
Problems are more likely, but still very rare, later in the test-flight program, when the pilots deliberately take the plane to its limits. An Airbus A330 prototype crashed here in July 1994, killing chief test pilot Nick Warner and six others as they conducted a simulated engine failure exercise.
Airbus says the A380 test-flight program is likely to take over a year and finish soon before the plane enters service for Singapore Airlines in mid-2006.
The A380, with a catalogue price of $282 million, represents a huge bet by Airbus that airlines will need plenty of large aircraft to transport passengers between ever-busier hub airports.
So far, Airbus has booked 154 orders for the A380, which it says will carry passengers 5 percent farther than Boeing's longest-range 747 jumbo at a per-passenger cost up to one-fifth lower.
But Airbus has yet to prove that it can turn a profit on its investment, a third of which came from European governments. Some analysts say signs of a boom in the market for smaller, long-range jets like Boeing's long-range 787 "Dreamliner" show that Airbus was wrong to focus resources on the superjumbo at the expense of its own mid-sized A350 - which enters service in 2010, two years after its Boeing rival.
Just this week, Air Canada and Air India announced a total of 82 new orders for Boeing jets - including 41 787s - taking Boeing's Dreamliner order book to 237.
But Airbus CEO Noel Forgeard played down Boeing's recent orders and the 787's development lead, saying the battle for the market in smaller planes would be fought out over 20 years, not two.
"Our competitor Boeing has woken up and gets a wave of orders," Forgeard told reporters attending the A380 test flight. "Good! Competition is an excellent thing."
Forgeard, who steps down later this year to become joint CEO of Airbus parent European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co., congratulated the A380 development and test-flight team for a "fantastic collective effort" and said the plane would enter service in the "second half of 2006" - about three months behind the previous schedule.
Part of the delay is down to the superjumbo's struggle with a weight problem that consumed months of engineering time and pushed the program's cost overrun to $1.88 billion. Competitive pressure on airlines to offer plusher, heavier business-class seating tightened the squeeze.
You tyalk like my grandma that was born in 1908 and would never leave Norway because she thought the rest of the world was chaos. Well thats your choice. There is so many wonderful places to go in the world. Thailand, Spain, Ireland, Australia, Dubai, Prague. I have travel and lived in the US for four years. A good experience. I am a curiuos person so I like to experience different cultures. I liked Las Vegas. Stayed there for six days and drove around for a week in Arizona. I have been to the midwest, New Orleans. Soon I will visit my friend in New Jersey. He loves to travel abroad.
> You tyalk like my grandma that was born in 1908 and would never leave Norway
Here's a hint: the US is a LOT bigger than Norway, far more diverse in terms of ecology, climate, culture, language, thenicity, etc that even all of Europe... and with absolutely no need for a passport.
> There is so many wonderful places to go in the world. Thailand, Spain, Ireland, Australia, Dubai, Prague
Ever neeb to Salt Lake City, UT, Monterray, CA, Silvis, IL, Mt. St. Helens?
> Stayed there for six days and drove around for a week in Arizona.
Just a *week*? Way to waste an experience.
This plane is as phony as the European Union.
Well i lived and studyed in the US for 4 years. Been around. A lot to see, but there are more interesting places around the glob
> A lot to see
More than a ifetime's worth. Europe has nothing good to offer that cannot be found in the US, except for simply being different. The Alps have nothing on the Rockies.
Okay I mention many places outside Europe that are interesting. Acctually I want to see other parts of the world than the US and Europe. Dubai, Australia, Thailand, Japan, China, South Africa, Brazil. Acctually Dubai is a favorite among many Norwegians. My cousin went there on his wedding trip. Looks awesome and it has the only 7 star hotel in the world etc.
> Dubai is a favorite among many Norwegians.
Indicating a defecit in Norway. What makes you think the US is similarly handicapped?
> it has the only 7 star hotel in the world
Whoopee. I prefer little out-of-the-way motels, to tell the truth. Best place I ever stayed was not some 7-star monstrocity, but a house converted into a boarding motel for loggers in the Oregon back woods. No passport needed.
Guess you tell my friend that is a hard core bush supporter from New Jersey that he doesnt love his country because he likes traveling outside his country. By the way I love out door life too. Logg homes are great, but I also like nice new buildings and other nice things. By the way in Dubai they are building so many cool things. Right now they are building artifical Palm islands that will be covered with nice buildings. Many stars have already bought apartments there. By the way there are things that can be view outside the US that the US does not have. Colloseum in Rome, Eiffel Tower, Taiwan tower, Wall of China that my father visited on a business trip 2-3 years ago etc. You like logg homes I like more things. Its your choice and I will not argue that. I think you are missing out of a lot of experiences, but thats my opinion. Well nice talking to you. Have a nice week.
> Logg homes are great, but I also like nice new buildings and other nice things.
The US has quite a number of nice new buildings and other nice things. Doesn't Norway?
> By the way there are things that can be view outside the US that the US does not have. Colloseum in Rome,
The US is *packed* with sports arenas.
> Eiffel Tower, Taiwan tower,
The US has towers galore. Ever been to the Space Needle?
> Wall of China
Lot's of walls in the US.
> I think you are missing out of a lot of experiences,
What makes you say that? I vacation in the US. It will take me the rest of my life and then some to see even a fraction of what the US has to offer. That being the case, why should I spend my money in foreign nations when *this* nation has more than enough to offer me?
I think it's easier to become an educated engineer or scientist in europe while it's easier to start - up in the US.
We can't perform like we do without our economic and scientific global network.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.