If you are prepared to believe that (in spite of well-documented proof that Iraq actually used WMDs against Kurds and Iranians) our recent failures to find WMDs in Iraq constitute "proof" that Iraq NEVER HAD such weapons, then, IMHO, your "gullibility index" needs re-calibration.
Of course, a high "gullibility index" would explain how it would be possible for a naif to conclude that difficulty in obtaining a book about, say, "Trolls", is proof, ipse facto, that "Trolls" do NOT exist.
Still, it is amusing to think that a person could claim to be more worried about EMP weapons than about atomic weapons, without realizing that EMPs are the result of atomic explosions...
"our recent failures to find WMDs in Iraq constitute "proof" that Iraq NEVER HAD such weapons"
Sadly, our failure to find WMDs in Iraq will constitute sufficient proof for many idiots that Iran has no WMDs or plans to build them.