Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFC__VRWC
To a point, I understand what they tried to do. The attempt was to keep this incident from becoming a media circus. Let's face it, handicapped child complains of being forced to give oral sex. Meida runs with it and look what happens. School is out of control, yada, yada, yada.

The school tried to keep a lid on it. And maybe even cover it up. In the circus that has ensued, it's hard to tell. But I'm sympathetic that the school doesn't need anymore black eyes, but then again it does need to have public scrutiny. It's just that TVN through Beck is creating a circus rather than taking this incident and using it as a stepping stone to really get to the bottom of what the real issues are at the Columbus Public Schools (and to an extent Southwestern City Schools) and where do we start in an effort to resolve the problems while keeping the most students in some sort of educational environment. Simply tossing the animals to the street isn't the answer.

24 posted on 04/25/2005 6:37:45 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks

"To a point, I understand what they tried to do. The attempt was to keep this incident from becoming a media circus. Let's face it, handicapped child complains of being forced to give oral sex. Meida runs with it and look what happens. School is out of control, yada, yada, yada."

To a point I don't understand a dang thing you are trying to say. This is not a yada, yada, yada situation. I want a media circus. I want this miscreants to be punished, not get off because they have had a tough upbringing. I want a school where this woman claims it was all consensual to be severly admonished, cleaning house if necessary.

I have not heard any major dispute about the general facts. The pinpointing of who, what, when, how, where, why always takes time; the firing was appropriate but the suspensions were way to lenient. There better be criminal charges against both the perpetrators and the administrators/teachers directly involved.

To end: I, to no point, understand what they tried to do!


28 posted on 04/25/2005 6:51:29 PM PDT by torchthemummy ("Sober Idealism Equals Pragmatism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

"To a point, I understand what they tried to do. The attempt was to keep this incident from becoming a media circus. Let's face it, handicapped child complains of being forced to give oral sex. Meida runs with it and look what happens. School is out of control, yada, yada, yada."

To a point I don't understand a dang thing you are trying to say. This is not a yada, yada, yada situation. I want a media circus. I want this miscreants to be punished, not get off because they have had a tough upbringing. I want a school where this woman claims it was all consensual to be severly admonished, cleaning house if necessary.

I have not heard any major dispute about the general facts. The pinpointing of who, what, when, how, where, why always takes time; the firing was appropriate but the suspensions were way to lenient. There better be criminal charges against both the perpetrators and the administrators/teachers directly involved.

To end: I, to no point, understand what they tried to do!


29 posted on 04/25/2005 6:53:17 PM PDT by torchthemummy ("Sober Idealism Equals Pragmatism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

"To a point, I understand what they tried to do. The attempt was to keep this incident from becoming a media circus. Let's face it, handicapped child complains of being forced to give oral sex. Meida runs with it and look what happens. School is out of control, yada, yada, yada."

To a point I don't understand a dang thing you are trying to say. This is not a yada, yada, yada situation. I want a media circus. I want these miscreants to be punished, not get off because they have had a tough upbringing. I want a school where this woman claims it was all consensual to be severly admonished, cleaning house if necessary.

I have not heard any major dispute about the general facts. The pinpointing of who, what, when, how, where, why always takes time; the firing was appropriate but the suspensions were way to lenient. There better be criminal charges against both the perpetrators and the administrators/teachers directly involved.

To end: I, to no point, understand what they tried to do!


30 posted on 04/25/2005 6:53:33 PM PDT by torchthemummy ("Sober Idealism Equals Pragmatism")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

"This incident" is a person, a young girl, who deserves to be protected and to have her attackers punished severely.

They broke the law, period. This should have been reported immediately.

And why do these "students" have unsupervised time hanging out in gangs in the cafeteria/gym?


38 posted on 04/25/2005 7:16:41 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Don't retire to Florida. They murder their "useless eaters".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson