To: Lutonian
I think the date is actually his baptismal date. He could have been born then since some were baptised at birth, but we don't know.
19 posted on
04/23/2005 5:37:26 PM PDT by
formercalifornian
(Libs worst nightmare: Rehnquist creeps out from shadows at inauguration)
To: formercalifornian
He was baptised on the 26th. It is known that it was pretty established tradition to baptise a baby on its third day. This is the accepted date. :)
21 posted on
04/23/2005 5:39:46 PM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson