Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

William Kristol: The Borking of Bolton
The Weekly Standard ^ | May 2, 2005 | William Kristol

Posted on 04/22/2005 9:38:26 PM PDT by quidnunc

To dismiss the assault on John Bolton as farcical and inconsequential is to miss its real meaning, and its impact if successful.

Hegel remarks somewhere that all great, world-historical facts and personages occur, as it were, twice. He has forgotten to add: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce. – Karl Marx

The misrepresentation of Robert Bork's views and character in 1987, and his subsequent defeat by the Senate for a Supreme Court seat, may not have risen quite to the level of tragedy. But a serious blow was delivered to the political health of the nation, and to the prospects for restoring sound constitutionalism to the Supreme Court.

The assault on John Bolton, on the other hand, seems to be a farce. The notion that bureaucratic infighting and occasional abruptness of manner should disqualify one from high office is laughable. Unable to defeat Bolton in a debate on the merits of the foreign policies he has advocated or implemented, the Democrats, the media, and some in the foreign policy establishment have resorted to a childish form of character assassination. Bolton disagreed with — he even disliked! — a couple of bureaucrats. He challenged them. But no one has really accused Bolton of doing anything fundamentally inappropriate. In fact, so far as anyone can tell, there seem to have been almost no formal management complaints filed against him — and very few informal ones — in his 16 years in government, which is fairly amazing.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bolton; kristol; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: hole_n_one
hole_n_one wrote: (Thanks very much for this one. It is excellent. I appreciate the post very much.) Guess what happens when the original source decides, at a time of their choosing, to delete the text that is linked via FR's "source" link. All FR has left is the simple excerpt.....nothing more. Try using that as a research tool 6 months from now.

Try using FR as a research tool for articles published in sources which prohibit their content from being posted here, like the Gannett publications, for instance.

This wouldn't have happened if their articles had been excerpted.

21 posted on 04/22/2005 10:24:25 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
My cat just finished reading this thread, and, since she can't type because of the issue related to her paws

Well, that's it. I'm reporting you to the government for not having an accesible keyboard for your cat. Honestly, some people....

22 posted on 04/22/2005 10:28:24 PM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Whatever.

I just fail to understand why YOU habitually needlessly excerpt.

You may have some moral compunction to be the way you are, which is fine, but you should leave the posting of articles which have sources without restriction to full text posting to other FReepers that don't have the ethical cross you seem so intent on carrying throughout this forum.

23 posted on 04/22/2005 10:37:39 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
I hope you feel better soon, FRiend!
24 posted on 04/22/2005 10:57:04 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

Ah, Thanks Man,Very Nice of you.


25 posted on 04/22/2005 11:07:56 PM PDT by cmsgop ( Don't Forget to check out Bea Arthur in the "Menopause Monologues"  coming on NBC this fall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WOSG; Oldsailor
I disagree. As bad as Hegel, Voinovich and the other RINOs are, Biden, Boxer, Kerry and Kennedy are far worse.

Unquestionably.

But if it takes threatening their re-election for these lily-livered wimps in the GOP majority to show some gumption, then, by damn, they need some threatening!

Support, money, votes, rallies, marches, pats on the back, etc., nothing else seems to give them any courage, so let's try scaring the crap out of 'em and see what happens.

26 posted on 04/22/2005 11:16:23 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
It should never be a "career ender" to support American interests over those of the U.N. kleptocrats.

What this is really about is patriotism.

The Senators in opposition to Bolton simply have allegiance to the U.N. and NOT to the U.S..
27 posted on 04/22/2005 11:31:53 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Thank you for posting the ENTIRE piece......this is getting insane with the way this person insists on exerpting EVERYTHING! Then when someone else posts a thread with the complete article it gets pulled as a duplicate.

I refuse to post(normally) on his threads, as others do, and its the surest way to kill a potentially interesting thread--i.e. Steyn-- to see his name it. I swear its his own way of ensuring that a thread is bypassed by most. I have had it and I wish the mods would delate his butt, when he does this needlessly.

28 posted on 04/23/2005 1:04:48 AM PDT by Grenada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

Excuse me, don't you have to report that dog biting incident to the police? That's the law around here. You know, just following procedure. Your lib neighbor wouldn't want to do anything outside of the bureaucracy, would he?


29 posted on 04/23/2005 1:11:32 AM PDT by John Robertson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

"The DOS must be riddled with incompetent boobs. I'm frankly surprised that Bolton didn't bust some heads over there!"

Hello incompetent boobs, meet te new Secretary, Condi Rice, big smile, carries a big stick, and uses it.


30 posted on 04/23/2005 1:18:49 AM PDT by Chu Gary (USN Intel guy 1967 - 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one; Freee-dame
But that's not all this fight is about. Bolton's accusers want to send the message that it's okay, perhaps, to agree with a conservative president's policies--but it's a career-ender if you take on the bureaucracy or the establishment aggressively on behalf of the president.

An important article! Bill Kristol seems to be getting stronger and stronger in his positions.

31 posted on 04/23/2005 5:54:06 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

We have GOT to stop talking about "new tones" and such crap, and start opposing these death rats first time, every time they get up on their high horses. Appeasement doesn't work any better with deathrats than it does with Saddam Hussein. Once you start paying the dane gelt you never get rid of the dane.

I'd like the verb "to Bork" to keep it's (unfortunate) meaning, and "to Bolton" to mean what happens when you get in our way.


32 posted on 04/23/2005 5:59:57 AM PDT by johnb838 (Free Republicans... To Arms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: okie01

"But if it takes threatening their re-election for these lily-livered wimps in the GOP majority to show some gumption, then, by damn, they need some threatening!

Support, money, votes, rallies, marches, pats on the back, etc., nothing else seems to give them any courage, so let's try scaring the crap out of 'em and see what happens."

Yes, Indeed. Made my threat to Sen V.'s office, will do what I can to defeat him if he screws this nomination up further ... if you get one of those fundraising letters from National Senatorial Republican Committee, send back a note saying "will not contribute to Senators that refuse to support the President's nominees!!"

And someone needs to take a 2x4 to the "come to Reagan" meeting these guys need.


33 posted on 04/23/2005 7:23:09 AM PDT by WOSG (Liberating Iraq - http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Humidston

This is what is known by the Libs as a "chilling effect." It is truly amazing that what the Libs complain about in others, is what they themselves continually practice.


34 posted on 04/23/2005 8:48:23 AM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!
And .. talking about throwing things - how about the stuff Hillary used to throw at Bill - documented by secret service people.

How is she going to be a viable candidate for President if she was formerly throwing things AT ANOTHER PRESIDENT. Hmmmmm??

Only the democrat rules apply - as usual.

But .. for a Bush admin person to put his hands on his hips and yell .. well now .. that is just out of line. These dems really do think we're stupid - it's aggravating.
35 posted on 04/23/2005 1:13:01 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

The best solution to get Bolton passed out of committee would be the replacement of all of the weak kneed Republicans and replace them with Republicans with backbone.


36 posted on 04/23/2005 1:26:27 PM PDT by hgro (ews)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one

I need to apologise for thee mistspellings or tyypos but sum fokes are abl to reed woords for there meenings.


37 posted on 04/24/2005 9:35:23 AM PDT by Oldsailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hansel
Didn't Hillary call someone a Jew Ba$tard? Was it Toe Sucker?

Actually, the term she used was "Fu*king Jew Ba$tard" (FJB in FR-speak), but it was not the toe sucker.

It was an aide to Governor Clinton in Arkansas in the mid-1980s.

38 posted on 04/24/2005 9:50:34 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one


Thanks for the FULL posting of a needlessly-excerpted article! :-)
39 posted on 04/24/2005 1:41:05 PM PDT by ConservativeStLouisGuy (11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson