[Junior]

You - Criticizing w/o having read Dr. Brown's work

I haven't read Einstein's work either, but I know what it says.

The TalkOrigins Link - Generalizes & exaggerates

In what way? Brown says that the waters came up from the ground and rained down on Earth. That's a pretty close synapsis, right? Now, Mr. "I took high school physics," how does the good doctor account for the energy required? I'm sure, since you understand physics and have read his material, that you could give us a short overview. If you don't, I'm going to assume you can't and therefore the good doctor never did attempt to account for it. If you try to pass the buck to me, I'm going to assume the same thing.

In other words, I don't believe TalkOrigins in any way "generalizes and exaggerates" the case at all. I think you're just handwaving away something that you and Dr. Brown cannot explain.

[savedbygrace]

You misunderstand or misrepresent. I don't "understand physics"; I took HS physics, and that was 40 years ago. In my first post to you, I told you to take it up with Dr. Brown, not me. Did you NOT comprehend that simple statement?

Now, physics genius, tell us: how much energy was required, and how much was available? I mean, since you claim your source isn't generalizing or exaggerating, surely this data is available, right? You wouldn't post a factless claim, would you? You being a physics genius and all.

When will you be scheduling your debate with Dr. Brown?