Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moore's Law original issue found [wife pleaded: throw away magazines, engineer kept them]
BBC ^ | Apr 21, 2005 | unknown

Posted on 04/22/2005 4:35:50 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko

The original Electronics magazine which published Moore's Law
Engineer David Clark had the prized magazine under his floorboards

A copy of the original Electronics magazine in which Moore's Law was first published has turned up under the floorboards of a Surrey engineer.

David Clark had kept copies of the magazine for years, despite pleas from his wife to throw them away.

Now the couple are celebrating after collecting the $10,000 reward which was offered on eBay by chip maker Intel.

Moore's Law, the principle that has driven the computer chip industry, celebrated 40 years this week.

"I am totally astonished. It is the most bizarre thing that has ever happened to me," Mr Clark told the BBC News website.

"I am really pleased about it because I studied physics and have always had interest in electronics. I could see the next 30 years were going to go like Moore's Law said, so I decided to go into electronics."

The "law" was adopted after Intel co-founder Gordon Moore wrote in the 1965 Electronics magazine article that the number of transistors on a chip would double every 24 months.

Read about the impact of Moore's Law

Chips that can work faster and faster have driven the technological and digital revolution so far.

Desperately wanted

"We're delighted to at last have an original copy of the April 1965 edition of Electronics Magazine," said an Intel spokesperson.

"Dr Moore's article established a theory that has underpinned advancements in the semiconductor industry over the past 40 years and is the basis of our continued research and development at Intel.

"We are delighted to have a copy of the article back in the home of Intel in Santa Clara and are extremely grateful to Mr Clark for making this possible."

The publication is now defunct, but neither Dr Moore, who is now retired, nor Intel had a mint condition original of the magazine.

Intel posted the reward on online auction site eBay in the run-up to the 40-year anniversary of the article on 19 April, in the hope that someone would have a copy for posterity.

Since the offer was posted, the search has been on all around the world to find an original.

Mr Clark, who admits he is "a bit of a hoarder", collected the Electronics magazine issues, as well as others, after the Philips Central Library in the UK - now closed - started to clean them out.

I could feel the hairs standing up on my arms. I think I've got that, I thought - although I wasn't sure

David Clark

"In the 70s, they started throwing out large quantities of these magazines," he said.

"I was in my 20s at the time and thought you shouldn't throw them out because they are recording the golden age of electronics."

He gave several hundreds of them a home first in his loft, then under the floorboards and had not looked at them since.

Until last Wednesday, when his RSS news reader popped up with headlines from various websites with the news of the reward.

"I could feel the hairs standing up on my arms. I think I've got that, I thought - although I wasn't sure.

"I took the rest of morning off, and pulled the furniture back; I hadn't seen them for 15 years. I started sorting through them."

The first pile he looked at only went as far back as 1970. It was not until he looked at another hidden and securely wrapped pile that he found the issue at the very top of the stack.

Part of history

When he contacted Intel, he thought they would not know what he was talking about.

He was officially told he was the "winner" two days ago. Intel had had hundreds of e-mails claiming to have an original copy, but Mr Clark's was the first authentic claim.

Dr Gordon Moore

Neither Dr Moore nor Intel had an original of the magazine

A bound copy of the volume of Electronics which contained the issue disappeared, soon after the reward was publicised, from the University of Illinois' engineering library.

Mr Clark now intends to use the money to help pay for his daughters' weddings. His wife also has some plans for the cash.

He did offer to hand over the copy himself to Dr Moore, who now lives in Hawaii.

"I feel quite fond of the law, so feel like a bit of history and pride in returning it to him," said Mr Clark.

In an interview with the Associated Press agency recently, Dr Moore said: "Electronics was one of the trade magazines that you read and throw away. It wasn't an archival journal."



TOPICS: News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 04/22/2005 4:35:50 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
No, you keep Playboy and Penthouse under the floorboards.

What a geek!

2 posted on 04/22/2005 4:37:32 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Be a "geek' for $10,000, I'm in!


3 posted on 04/22/2005 4:39:14 AM PDT by sausageseller (Look out for the jackbooted spelling police. There! Everywhere!(revised cause the "man" accosted me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

A copy of this article should be kept to show any wife or mom who wants to toss out those precious items they consider junk.

I don't want to start a series of rants on this, but how many of us owned stuff as a kid that would now be worth serious money?


4 posted on 04/22/2005 4:59:28 AM PDT by auntdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
David Clark had kept copies of the magazine for years, despite pleas from his wife to throw them away.

Just like grandma throwing away my dad's first issue comic books from the 30's.

5 posted on 04/22/2005 5:00:41 AM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auntdot

Amen.

Let this be a lesson to all the nagging women out there that "demand" that their men throw things away.


6 posted on 04/22/2005 5:00:58 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: auntdot; Mike Fieschko

auntdot sez:

A copy of this article should be kept to show any wife or mom who wants to toss out those precious items they consider junk.

I don't want to start a series of rants on this, but how many of us owned stuff as a kid that would now be worth serious money?

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
It would only be worth serious money because MOST people DID throw their "stuff" away. No difference in this case, either. Most people (and institutions, apparently) tossed, or lost to theft, this particular issue of a techie journal. So the owner of the rare surviving copy makes a bundle.

The value is in the rarity, and current interest. Nothing else.


7 posted on 04/22/2005 5:12:27 AM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: auntdot
I don't want to start a series of rants on this, but how many of us owned stuff as a kid that would now be worth serious money?

I call this the Memorabilia Paradox. Memorabilia is only worth serious money, because so many people threw most of it away years ago. If every kid had saved every baseball card they ever had, old baseball cards would be as common as dirt.

Look at it this way: by throwing all that stuff out, the moms/wives of the world are doing their part to ensure that a robust and thriving market in memorabilia exists today. Thus, it's their duty to throw stuff out!

8 posted on 04/22/2005 6:30:53 AM PDT by Panzerfaust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Panzerfaust

Not to mention that if the geek spent the buck on the first Intel shares, instead of the magazine, he'd probably have more than $10,000 today.


9 posted on 04/22/2005 8:52:34 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson