Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum applies brakes due to Poll
The Hill via confirm them.com ^ | Arpil 20, 2004 | Andrew Hyman

Posted on 04/21/2005 7:52:11 AM PDT by rcocean

An article in The Hill reports that Senator Rick Santorum is backpedalling on the move toward a showdown on the judicial filibuster issue. The main reason seems to be poll results that are being kept under wraps.

Here’s the main way the GOP is erring, in my opinion: instead of saying that judicial nomination filibusters will be eliminated, the GOP obviously should be saying that nomination filibusters simply have to be limited, to a year for example. NO AVERAGE AMERICAN IN HIS OR HER RIGHT MIND WOULD OPPOSE SHUTTING UP SENATORS AFTER AN ENTIRE YEAR OF FLOOR DEBATE ON A NOMINATION

(Excerpt) Read more at confirmthem.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: confirmation; filibuster; judges; santorum; senate; ussenate
Santorum backpedling because of a Poll. Is there anything we can do to get these Senate Republicans a spine? From the Hill via Confirm them.com - a good comphensive web-site supporting us in the Filibuster fight.
1 posted on 04/21/2005 7:52:12 AM PDT by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rcocean

A year? No way. I'd limit all filibusters to 2 weeks at most. It is supposed to be a delaying tactic used to gain some time to convince other Senators that they are doing something rash. It should not be used to prevent the majority from acting on anything, because then, it will take 60 votes to do anything in the Senate, and then nothing will get done.


2 posted on 04/21/2005 7:57:19 AM PDT by Defiant (Amend the Constitution to nullify all decisions not founded on original intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Hang on a second before we hang Santorum in effigy. Let's stay focused on the next week, which apparently will be critical. These Republicans (and ESPECIALLY Santorum) know that their political futures are dead if they betray us on the judiciary. Let it play out first.


3 posted on 04/21/2005 7:58:30 AM PDT by Deo et Patria (Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria

And if they DON'T know, let's make it very very clear to them.
Call. Write. Fax.

Don't waste your time e-mailing.


4 posted on 04/21/2005 8:03:49 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Bring up one of the judges whom the dims will filibuster. Let them filibuster. When the people get good and sick and tired of seeing these fools, especially that klown, Byrd, in the news every night, then vote to change the rule.

As it is now, only a small minority of people even know what this filibuster thing is all about. So when they're polled on it they instinctively vote not to "cut off debate." Let them see with their own eyes what a filibuster is and they'll see that a filibuster is a way to avoid democracy, not part of it.


5 posted on 04/21/2005 8:08:03 AM PDT by Riemann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria
These Republicans (and ESPECIALLY Santorum) know that their political futures are dead if they betray us on the judiciary

We need to make good on that promise if we ever want to put a stop to this sort of "weak sister" representation.

Is anyone else sick and friggin' tired of watching those preening a-hole democrats act like they own the joint, when election after election, we kick their asses all over the place?

I mean, what the hell?

6 posted on 04/21/2005 8:11:57 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: borkrules
Is anyone else sick and friggin' tired of watching those preening a-hole democrats act like they own the joint, when election after election, we kick their asses all over the place?

Don't you think that maybe, just maybe, there's a connection there?

7 posted on 04/21/2005 8:13:57 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

I just called the Senator's DC Office and asked if it was truen that the Senator is backing off the constitutional option of stopping democrat fillibusters.. The lady answering the phone said "I can't speak for the Senator". Hello! That is your job! Considering she can't speak for the Senator I take that it is true.

Washington, D.C. Office:
511 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Main: 202-224-6324


8 posted on 04/21/2005 8:17:56 AM PDT by Republican Red (DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Ah, the Constitution of Santorum. What a time-tested document it is. What would we do without it?


9 posted on 04/21/2005 8:26:42 AM PDT by Niteranger68 ("I am not a conservative because I am successful; I am successful because I am a conservative.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

If you mean that their repeated electoral defeats are driving dems to act nutty and that the nuttiness leads to further electoral defeats, my answer is "maybe".

But that still doesn't address the failure to move aggressively and authoritatively on the issue of the president's nominations, most importantly, judicial nominations.


10 posted on 04/21/2005 8:31:01 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria
I don't like the way Bush is acting. Where is he in all this? After all, they're HIS nominees. He seems to AWOL on Bolton too.
11 posted on 04/21/2005 8:49:37 AM PDT by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria
I don't like the way Bush is acting. Where is he in all this? After all, they're HIS nominees. He seems to AWOL on Bolton too.
12 posted on 04/21/2005 8:49:37 AM PDT by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
Nuclear option and Bolton, NOW!

By October 2006, the only thing the Sheeple will care about is their financial well being- the election of the depraved Clinton conclusively documents that!

Bolton and filibuster won't even be remembered.
13 posted on 04/21/2005 9:03:28 AM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

It is now even more evident what a bunch of gutless arseholes the GOP pols are.

Wearing thundering boots they enter stage right, loudly proclaiming to voters all the great things they will do, if only they achieve a majority.

Yet, once in that position of power, they slither fearfully around the stage silently in silken slippers, accomplishing, "NOTHING."

I am ready to wash my hands of the bloody GOP lot, they are worthless cowards, or worse yet, damnable liars.


14 posted on 04/21/2005 9:05:15 AM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirthomasthemore
Bolton and filibuster won't even be remembered...

Exactly!

There is almost NO political price to be paid on this, unless you consider it a "political price" to have the elite media say nasty things about you.

To HELL with what the "polls" say about the "nuclear option" and John Bolton. Good God in His High Heaven, no one, and I mean no one is going to base a vote on how their Senator voted on John Bolton or Senate rules changes. NO ONE.

It's just like Campaign Finance Reform. Gutless wonders allowed themselves to be bullied into thinking the American People were clamoring for "reform" so those gutless pukes went for that blatantly unconstitutional bill (including Bush). But nobody cared, really. If they had stood up and done the right thing it wouldn't have made any difference come election day 2004. None.

Like Ted Nugent says, it's so simple its stupid.

15 posted on 04/21/2005 10:00:17 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: borkrules
Yep, Bork.

Same, I'm afraid, with Terri. If Jeb had taken executive action, or even the President- it would now all be history behind the pedophile Jackson and our new Greta Pope!

New news cycle, ratings, and all that.
16 posted on 04/21/2005 10:09:33 AM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
He seems to AWOL on Bolton too.

I watched him give a speech this morning on FNC calling for Bolton's immediate confirmation.

17 posted on 04/21/2005 11:37:14 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
And here it is.
18 posted on 04/21/2005 12:15:19 PM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson