I'm a scientist, so your lecture on studies was superfluous.
I wouldn't have considered that a lecture, at least in the academic sense of the word. You seemed to be overly defensive of studies in general, without defining anything. That's what caught my attention.
I'm not terribly impressed with titles -- actually, less so the older I get.
What kind of scientist are you? I consider myself somewhat of a scientist in the science of living life and learning from it as I go along. I consider that my responsibility whether or not I have gotten certified by others, but I would be interested in hearing more about your calling and credits if you care to share.