Sigh - willful ignorance is no defence. Buchanan himself lists Smith's four exceptions - which one applies to Chinese trade? Protecting commodity manufactured goods as incipient technologies? The point was, there are plenty of respected journals to support your side - don't go playing with the opposition's if you don't fully understand them.
Nephi has been here since 1998, and you've been here nine months -- you're just a newborn
Google your tag and see what types of results you get. Now, consider whether or not you've ever used the tag in any passing reference outside of FR - email, conversation, placard, etc.
There are plenty of people here that, due to certain work/professional assocations, are constantly updating their tags to erase any potential tracks. Personally, I've been here since '98 under at least 4 different guises.
Sigh - willful ignorance is no defence. Buchanan himself lists Smith's four exceptions - which one applies to Chinese trade? Protecting commodity manufactured goods as incipient technologies? The point was, there are plenty of respected journals to support your side - don't go playing with the opposition's if you don't fully understand them.
????????????
I suppose we could amuse ourselves by limiting the discussion to early 18th century corn laws and the corn trade. :-)