Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Serb5150
"Actually, they do:"

ack.. I had no idea. I guess fat people deserve what they get then. If people are going to ask for government benefits they no longer have the right to freedom. They become government slaves and I guess they will have to give up their Big macs. Fatties who demand Medicaid treatments for obesity should be locked up and given 300 calories a day until they are thin again. Repeat as necessary.

Sorry, I doubted you. You are right, at least as far as the fatties at obesity.org are concerned. Normally I believe the government should stay out of peoples lives, but not if the people in question are demanding government handouts.
107 posted on 04/18/2005 9:39:35 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: monday
An old liberal cliche was not to attack crime but address the root causes of that crime. Let's apply their own technique to the issue of increasing numbers of overweight Americans:

1. The 40 year old "war on smoking" caused the number of smokers to drop from about one half to one quarter of American adults. While smoking is unhealthy and a high risk behavior, the fact is that a majority of ex-smokers tend to gain weight after quitting.

2. The denigration of marriage and the contempt poured upon housewives on the part of the mainstream culture encouraged women to leave marriages or seek outside employment to seek "fulfillment." "No fault" divorce laws, the so-called marriage penalty in the IRS code, and tax-subsidized day care also discouraged traditional homemaking. As a result, food preparation was increasingly outsourced to the restaurant business, where, at least at the fast food and lower price end, tended to appeal to the least common denominator. The increased use of prepackaged food (canned, frozen, etc.) is another example of this tendency.

3. The other end of weight control is exercise. To the extent that parents, guided by the permissive parenting that has been in vogue for decades, cater to their childrens' whims, buythem cars when they turn 16, give them spending money used for "junk food," and not require the completion of chores, they contribute to a failure of children to exercise. To a considerable extent, obesity stemming from a lack of enforcing discipline is a consequence of liberal permissiveness.

4. There has been in some circles a general denigration of masculinity in the traditional sense. Combined with the nihilism in the youth culture, a philosophy manufactured by and delivered to "independent, anti-establishment" youth by malefactors of great wealth (to steal some New Deal era rhetoric), many young men turn away from the sports fields and the outdoors to the inner space of mosh pits, student unions, and narcotics. The people in Georgetown, Cambridge, Beverly Hills, and the Upper East Side of New York fear the sort of young men in Army and Marine combat units than those with piercings, tattoos, and hair coloring not known to nature.

To a great extent, the increase in obesity among Americans is the outcome of governmental policies and elitist attitudes. Rather than more regulation and guilt trips, corrective measures should deal with root causes: permissiveness, hostility to traditional values, including opposition to the classical family unit, and denigration of manhood. These root causes stem from liberalism and its secular humanist and positivist underpinnings.

135 posted on 04/18/2005 1:47:45 PM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson