Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Recently Published NEW TESTAMENT Papyri from Oxyrhynchus: Overview and Assessment
Tyndale Bulletin 51 ^ | April 15, 2005? | Peter M. Head

Posted on 04/16/2005 8:54:33 PM PDT by rface

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
I find this quite interesting. Many (some) of the critics of Christianity want to claim that the New Testement was written far removed from the life and times of Christ, and therefore cannot be trusted as authentic accounts.

The earliest Gospel manuscripts that we can uncover with a fairly certain date, are from the 2nd century (between 100 AD and 200 AD). It looks like there are more and more early manuscripts coming to light. I am sure that these early manuscripts will not quiet the tongues of the critics of Christ, but I am glad that there are people who dig up this early history of the Christian Church.

1 posted on 04/16/2005 8:54:35 PM PDT by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

ping


2 posted on 04/16/2005 9:01:48 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (" It is not true that life is one damn thing after another-it's one damn thing over and over." ESV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Actually, the even bigger find with the successful ability to read the Oxyrhynchus Papyri using modern computer imaging technology is the discovery of a very large number of writings by ancient Greek and Roman authors that were considered "lost" in the past. We may suddenly see a large number of plays by Euripides, Sophocles, and Aristophanes becoming available again, not to mention other works, including never-before discovered material from Hesiod, the author of the epic poems Theogeny and Works and Days.
3 posted on 04/16/2005 9:01:58 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

It is all Greek to me.


4 posted on 04/16/2005 9:02:45 PM PDT by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
Bump
To read later
5 posted on 04/16/2005 9:04:59 PM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

Har har.


6 posted on 04/16/2005 9:05:31 PM PDT by The Grammarian ("Preaching is in the shadows. The world does not believe in it." --W.E. Sangster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert

well it's too bad I can't read Grecian either


7 posted on 04/16/2005 9:06:28 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rface
This might help...

8 posted on 04/16/2005 9:10:06 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (I am sick of brownshirts in black robes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rface
The total number of NT manuscripts on papyrus found at Oxyrhynchus is therefore forty-seven. This is a significant proportion of the total of perhaps 111 separate manuscripts, most of which are completely without provenance.

Can anyone explain the significance of 47 or 111 in Christianity?

9 posted on 04/16/2005 9:40:42 PM PDT by japaneseghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface
The consensus is firmly in favour of viewing this number as an example of gematria, in which the number stands for the name of a person (‘the number of his name’, Rev. 13:17; 15:2), and the person in mind would be Nero. It is likely that 666 arose from a Hebrew transliteration of Neron Caesar from Greek into Hebrew (rsq Nwrn).[38] It is notable that an equivalent transliteration from Latin into Hebrew results in 616 (rsq wrn).

Bookmarking for rereading later.

10 posted on 04/16/2005 9:46:49 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: japaneseghost
Can anyone explain the significance of 47 or 111 in Christianity?

They have no mystical significance. The just happen to be the number of different types of manuscripts referred to in the article.

11 posted on 04/16/2005 9:50:47 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasGreg; GarySpFc

Ping


12 posted on 04/16/2005 10:00:00 PM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

bump for later


13 posted on 04/17/2005 12:11:56 AM PDT by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

The early documents about Jesus date further back, and in greater number, than any other REMOTELY close documents about any other events or figures in history. The care that was taken to ensure faithful and accurate transmission further confirms that we get the Gospels "straight from the horse's mouth."


14 posted on 04/17/2005 5:50:40 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

> plays by Euripides, Sophocles, and Aristophanes becoming available again, not to mention other works, including never-before discovered material from Hesiod, the author of the epic poems Theogeny and Works and Days.

I'd go for some complete archaic lyric poetry and a good account of the pentakontaeteia.

Who knows what treasures the sand will yield?


15 posted on 04/17/2005 5:57:40 AM PDT by cloud8 (Sometimes I just kill me. I really do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rface

My understanding is that we have significant reliably dated fragments of most if not all the Gospels from within 30-60 years of Christ's Ascension.

I think Josh McDowell's site has lots of that data.


16 posted on 04/17/2005 12:51:10 PM PDT by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING ITS POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I am no expert - but I do know that there is much debate about the reliability of the dates given to some, or many, of these fragments. I also know that critics of Christianity and the Bible will never be silenced by archeological evidence. There could be manuscripts written by the hand of Christ himself - and the critics would hate it all the more.


17 posted on 04/17/2005 1:07:42 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rface

I agree.

And some of the most hostile to moves of God are some of the loudest on the Religion forum! Sadly.


18 posted on 04/17/2005 1:19:26 PM PDT by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING ITS POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Just adding this to the GGG catalog, not sending a general distribution.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

19 posted on 05/19/2005 9:51:20 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rface

Is there any information about whether any of these most ancient manuscripts have changed hands recently? I was informed that a Matthew fragment passed from British to American hands within the past few years. It may or may not be P64/67 at Magdalen College. The purchaser would be Dr. Gene Scott or an organization in the Los Angeles area.


20 posted on 08/18/2005 6:23:12 PM PDT by hvantwist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson