"His motives may have been wrong but the decision was still his according to the state of Florida"
The decision, according to the state of Florida, is hers. He represented one view of her wishes and her parents represented another view of her wishes.
No, the decision according to the state of Florida is the guardian's, which happened to be Schiavo. Under your logic if someone is laying in a bed with no brain left, they would never be able to disconnect them because the person didn't sit up and tell them to. His view was supported by law where her parents view was supported by what I have no idea other than emotions.
Look don't bother responding because frankly I'm tired of arguing about this crap (and that's what it is). The rule of law stood. You didn't like it, so your side chooses instead to play word games. The rule of law in Florida stood and thank God the national government couldn't find the angle to get involved. And I will personally do everything that I can that statists that believe as you do (that the national government had any issue in this matter) will never get elected into office now or in the future. If that means eventually replacing every politician from the one big party in Washington then so be it.