Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

I never said she didn't have a feeding tube from 1990 on. After the third swallow test, it was recommended the testing be discontinued.

We seem to often talk at cross purposes. The links to information you wish to read have been posted many, many times, Cboldt. Check it out and let me know what you find.


185 posted on 04/16/2005 10:51:32 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever killed or captured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
The links to information you wish to read have been posted many, many times, Cboldt. Check it out and let me know what you find.

I hadn't (and haven't) seen a relatively uninterrupted series of reports from 1990 to 2005. I do appreciate your confirnation that Terri was never fed, other than a feeding tube, from 1990 to 2005.

I never said she didn't have a feeding tube from 1990 on.

And I never put those words in your mouth. The evidence I was trying to obtain was the UNINERRUPTED nature of the method of feeding, not whether she had one in 1990, or whether she had one in 2005. When the question is in relation to the UNINTERRUPTED nature of method of feeding, an answer that she had a feeding tube in 1990, and she had a feeding tube in 2005 is not fully responsive.

Now, given three swallaow tests, about a year apart, and the first one coming in 1990 or 1991, and no attempts at mouth feeding following the last of three swallow test, we create an uninterrupted chronology, which is what I asked about in the first place. I think the following list represents the cronology as you see it.


199 posted on 04/16/2005 11:07:37 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson