Oh, please don't go quoting Dr. H to back up your position.
In 2002 when the Schindlers were permitted to bring two of their own doctors to court, any doctors they chose, it's worth noting the two they brought are alternative medicine doctors.
One didn't even know the difference between a coma and PVS.
Dr. H claims to have a Nobel nomination but can't produce it in court. He claims to have helped people like Terri but can't produce one single document or record of such for the court.
He advertises in the National Inquirer, insurance companies won't work with him and so his patients must pay cash.
There is room for question on everything else but that.
Nice try at a switch ... the topic is the accuracy of medical information as it is verifiable with other evidence. But you again try to impeach the doctors who don't fit with your preconceived verdict ... and it is becoming very obvious that you support the execution of Terri Schiavo so far as it allows you to berate Freepers you deem too uneducated to know better than to protest the wrongs done to Terri by a process judicial absent due process according to our Constitution. And since you have an obsession for 'last wordism', I'll sign off from responding to you any further so you can feel successful with your posts.