Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Torie
There was a law discriminating against homosexuals in practice, because homosexuals engage in sodomy.

The court overturned all sodomy laws, not only those aimed at homosexuals. You may say that it is disingenuous to claim that sodomy laws forbidding sodomy in all cases were not aimed at homosexuals, but is it really hard to believe that the same Texans who disapprove of homosexual acts also disapprove of other deviant heterosexual acts?

Private sex acts are surely more private, than abortions effected in hospitals.

Same for incest?

What else is so private that we should not be allowed to restrict it?

Drug abuse? Prostitution? Cannibalism?

671 posted on 04/24/2005 5:47:33 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies ]


To: Tailgunner Joe
What else is so private that we should not be allowed to restrict it?

Just send a note to Justice Kennedy and ask him. I can't help you.

673 posted on 04/24/2005 5:50:39 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Actually the Texas law did apply only to homosexuals. LOL. I could say more, but why beat the drum until it has no sound.


676 posted on 04/24/2005 5:52:10 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson