Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phenn
It was only after the 1999 statute changes that a non-terminally ill person could have a feeding tube removed without a written, advanced directive and that was only in cases of PVS.

Not true. Already adressed in Browning. Mrs. Browning, a non-PVS patient and a non-terminally-ill person had the right to refuse feeding tubes. No written directive was required, an oral statement was sufficient said the court.

Further to that, under Florida's evidence code, Michael Schiavo's testimony of Terri's alleged oral declaration was NEVER admissible.

False again. No wonder you can't understand why the Schindlers kept losing their court battles.

59 posted on 04/15/2005 3:36:40 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: george wythe

Browning was "PVS".


61 posted on 04/15/2005 3:48:29 PM PDT by phenn (http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: george wythe

Further to that, under Florida's evidence code, Michael Schiavo's testimony of Terri's alleged oral declaration was NEVER admissible.

False again. No wonder you can't understand why the Schindlers kept losing their court battles.

Zatso?

http://flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=Ch0090/SEC602.HTM&Title=-%3E2004-%3ECh0090-%3ESection%20602#0090.602


62 posted on 04/15/2005 3:49:56 PM PDT by phenn (http://www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson