[robertpaulsen]

I read it. So? It says nothing, basically a "he said, she said". Why was I supposed to read this?

I originally said that they had a falling out because the Schindlers wanted half of Michael's loss of consortium award. Your post merely reinforces my statement.

[blueriver]

I read it. So? It says nothing, basically a "he said, she said". Why was I supposed to read this? I originally said that they had a falling out because the Schindlers wanted half of Michael's loss of consortium award. Your post merely reinforces my statement.

How could you say it says nothing when in fact it says very clearly that it was ONLY Michaels PERSPECTIVE that the falling out was about the loss of consortium money. It goes on to say that the Shindlers had a different PERSPECTIVE on what the falling out was about and that was that Michael failed to honor his commitment to spend the money on Terri as he promised he would. How is it that Michaels perspective becomes fact for you, Judge Greer and the St Pete Times?

Are you just refusing to see what is clearly placed in front of your eyes or are you that dense.