Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueriver
Those two? Dr. "Nominated for the Nobel Prize" (who stated in a sworn affidavit that Terri was not in a PVS eight months before he examined her? That guy?

And Dr. Hyperbaric new age radiologist (not neurologist)? Him?

Yeah, well, the court gave their testimony the consideration it deserved.

123 posted on 04/18/2005 1:45:38 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Those two? Dr. "Nominated for the Nobel Prize" (who stated in a sworn affidavit that Terri was not in a PVS eight months before he examined her? That guy? And Dr. Hyperbaric new age radiologist (not neurologist)? Him? Yeah, well, the court gave their testimony the consideration it deserved.

If they were not valid Dr's the court should have never allowed them to be 2 of the 5 Doctors that were going to decide on her state of mind. For the court to allow them to be a part of the jury and then to disqualify them based on their credentials just goes to show you how incredibly corrupt and bogus the entire trial was.

124 posted on 04/18/2005 1:55:05 PM PDT by blueriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson