Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gumlegs
I work with a guy who was on Chicago in the early 70s. He was an electrician.

Talked to a fellow a few years ago who spent 5 years on Missouri--late 80s-early 90s. One thing he told me I thought interesting was that in bad weather that the escorts could not keep up with the BB. Also, Missouri had something like 15,000 miles worth of fuel at cruising speeds and was able I think to refuel it's escorts.

325 posted on 04/16/2005 9:53:02 PM PDT by Rockpile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]


To: Rockpile
I work with a guy who was on Chicago in the early 70s. He was an electrician.

Jeez, small world. His name isn't Mike Borio, is it?

Your observations about the seaworthiness of the BBs vs the smaller escorts are correct as far as I know. But it's not really surprising, because the big ships were intended to be stable firing platforms. That would tend to make them more stable under all conditions.

I've seen Gulf War era photos of the Iowas refueling their escorts, but I can't seem to find them at the moment.

326 posted on 04/16/2005 10:08:29 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson