Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

They are out to pasture. The point is what do you replace them with, because they still have a function, or do you allow the capability to go by the wayside?


135 posted on 04/15/2005 7:24:55 AM PDT by Wombat101 (Sanitized for YOUR protection....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: Wombat101
You have to do a cost/benefit analysis. Obviously, this capability is not that important, otherwise the ships would be operational and not in mothballs. I can't see keeping 60 year old ships around just because they provide a "capabiltiy." We have cruise missiles, more accurate munitions, which can supply the needed firepower. We have trouble staffing a 300+ ship navy now.

I can understand the love of the battleship. It is an impressive sight to behold, but it represents a different era.

144 posted on 04/15/2005 7:31:42 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson