Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Binghamton_native; Elsie
Understand that there are also Greek scholars who are not in agreement with your take on this passage. Just for other readers of this thread that are not knowledgeable in Greek, I think that they should be aware that your take on this passage is not a gimme.

See here ----> http://www.aomin.org/Epitetaute.html

Let's be crystal clear here. No Greek scholar in the entire world claims that the pronouns and verbs in verses 17-19 are not singular. No one! Not even James White. Only someone who had no clue about Greek would even say that any of the 2nd person pronouns in verses 17-19 are plural. No Greek scholar claims that in verses 17-19, Jesus is talking to anyone other than Peter.

The point of disagreement is not at all whether in vs. 17-19 Jesus is talking only to Peter. James White (and some other Protestant Greek scholars, though not all) disagree with with Catholics regarding the referent of [epi taute te petra] "upon this rock". Catholic scholars say that the referent of 'taute te petra' is Peter. Some Protestant scholars say that the referent of 'taute te petra' is either Peter's profession of Christ's identity or Peter's faith.

-A8

1,462 posted on 04/27/2005 8:27:09 PM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1459 | View Replies ]


To: adiaireton8

Touche' as to which person is indicated in the passage. For now, I'll take your word on that. However, you make my point that there are Greek scholars on both sides of the issue as to meaning of the passage.


1,463 posted on 04/28/2005 12:36:26 AM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1462 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson