[AndrewC]

Failure to understand English on the part of Thatcherite, adequately proved.

[Thatcherite]

You say "NO" in response to what you characterize as as strawman interpretation of those verses on my part. But you refuse to say how the verses should be interpreted. You introduce assorted irrelevancies like McVeigh and "children" vs "sons" (or at least you have still failed to satisfactorily explain the relevance of either of those things).

Your privilege, I guess. I'll continue to ponder how someone who views the Bible as the inspired word of God should handle those verses. You butted into a discussion that was about these issues, and now you are telling *me* to take the discussion elsewhere! Hilarious.