Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Thatcherite
Avoid my "strawman" if you see it as that by clearly explaining your own position in this matter.

My position is clear, "No" to your loaded question. You've already been shown to change words expressed in the Bible. I told you, that if you had further questions that they would be answered on the religion forum. Now clearly understand this, I avoid your strawman by pointing it out. Normal people understand the word "son", "glutton", and "drunkard". They know that children, in the sense that you obviously intended, are not drunkards. Now, your fishing for some answer with which you can further attempt to build strawmen will recieve my previous answer, I don't do dances. Go to the religion forum for your answers.

367 posted on 05/03/2005 1:07:27 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: AndrewC
So right, rebelliousness is a capital offence for males whose parents are alive only, not females, but not small kids (under the age where they might get drunk), and you agree with this. OK.

And McVeigh was rightly executed for rebelliousness, not mass murder. My mistake.

369 posted on 05/03/2005 1:44:46 PM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson