To: AndrewC
Because "that" is not the Biblical position.Interestingly that is not amongst your fellow Christian Ahban's responses. He appears to see those things as the Biblical position AFAICS in this thread. At the very least he has never unequivocally denied it (as you have).
345 posted on
05/03/2005 9:50:04 AM PDT by
Thatcherite
(Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
To: Thatcherite
He appears to see those things as the Biblical position AFAICS in this thread. At the very least he has never unequivocally denied it (as you have).I'll let him speak for himself, but I put "that" in quotes for a reason.
349 posted on
05/03/2005 9:56:35 AM PDT by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson