Skip to comments.
Understanding the Wal-Mart Effect
TechCentralStation.com ^
| 04-11-05
| Max Borders
Posted on 04/11/2005 7:08:56 AM PDT by Rhoades
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 next last
To: ran15
Now he is almost identical to Ralph Nader or Dennis Kucinich on economic issues.
Not to mention Greenpeace, Oxfam, AFL-CIO, the Greens, and socialists of every other stripe known to man.
101
posted on
04/11/2005 12:01:37 PM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: Terriergal
That is exactly why I like to tell socialists.. then don't shop there.
Because I know in the end their greed will overcome them, and they will go to Walmart even to save a couple pennies.
102
posted on
04/11/2005 12:03:05 PM PDT
by
ran15
To: MississippiMan
Also note this: Pay attention to the "boutique" businesses that pop up to differentiate themselves. Wal-Mart does. And the moment those niches start to become widely accepted and dependably profitable, Wal-Mart will step in and take them, too. There are some areas Wal-Mart really can't compete in because their business model doesn't allow for it. Around the DC area, we have Wal-Mart, but we also have a very succesful high-end food chain called Whole Foods. The type of people who shop at Whole Foods aren't going to go shopping at Wal-Mart for their organic food needs.
Wal-Mart can beat anyone on price, true, but price isn't everything.
103
posted on
04/11/2005 12:04:16 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: Paulus Invictus
Nevertheless you still cannot avoid knowing that multiple Chicom missiles are still aimed at us, thanks to the billions per year that W-M et al send along to China with nary a worry about how that mega-money is used. Blame Congress. They could shut off trade with China tomorrow, if they wanted to.
Don't blame Wal-Mart for engaging in lawful business.
104
posted on
04/11/2005 12:09:50 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: evilthatmendo
what i don't understand is why folks like you don't see anything wrong with grossly UNDERPAYING average working people In a free market system, no one is overpaid or underpaid. Your labor is worth exactly the rate you and your employer agree upon.
i want to see average working people of america treated more fairly in regards to wages and benefits. what on earth is wrong with wanting to preserve the american middle class?
Other than government mandated wages or letting the free-market determine wages, how would you suggest that this come about?
105
posted on
04/11/2005 12:14:25 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: ken21
i chose wal-mart. wal-mart's ahead at this time at 16%. I voted for Lloyd's of London, but only because they've been around for so much longer and will probably be around when Wal-Mart disappears.
106
posted on
04/11/2005 12:18:11 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: Modernman
What is it that causes usually rationally thinking people to propose all kinds of government restrictions aimed at Wal-Mart and abrigations of our rights to do what we want to do that they wouldn't tolerate when directed at anyone else? I'd just like to know.
107
posted on
04/11/2005 12:24:39 PM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: The Great Yazoo
What is it that causes usually rationally thinking people to propose all kinds of government restrictions aimed at Wal-Mart and abrigations of our rights to do what we want to do that they wouldn't tolerate when directed at anyone else? Envy. Deep down inside, many people don't like to see others do well.
Wal-Mart is VERY good at its business model. It has killed, or nearly killed, a whole bunch of other retailers that weren't as good at figuring out how to make the low-cost/high volume retail business model work. On the other hand, Wal-Mart's success has forced other surviving retailers to innovate and come up with new business models and it has encouraged the creation of new companies that can cover areas outside of Wal-Mart's business model (such as high-cost/high-quality retail).
That being said, there have been a lot of companies that were very good at their business model but that went extinct when the world changed around them. A century from now, Wal-Mart might only exist in history books.
108
posted on
04/11/2005 12:32:23 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: Modernman; All
That is correct, who knows some store will overtake Walmart.. When I don't know...
109
posted on
04/11/2005 12:38:44 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: Modernman
There are some areas Wal-Mart really can't compete in because their business model doesn't allow for it. Around the DC area, we have Wal-Mart, but we also have a very succesful high-end food chain called Whole Foods. The type of people who shop at Whole Foods aren't going to go shopping at Wal-Mart for their organic food needs. Wal-Mart can beat anyone on price, true, but price isn't everything.
The crowd to whom price isn't everything is a tiny percentage. In a large metro area, sure, the ultra-specialized businesses that are run right can make it because even a small percentage of the whole still constitutes a large enough customer base. Not in small towns.
Just keep an eye on the ever-expanding Wal-Mart selection. Twenty years ago, if you wanted a nice TV, you went to a consumer electronics store. Ten years ago, you went to Circuit City as the indies were by and large fading into the sunset. Now you can buy HDTV plasma at Wal-Mart, and for the vast majority of people, those models are good enough. And that is of course just one category of merchandise. The trend applies to many others.
MM
110
posted on
04/11/2005 12:43:28 PM PDT
by
MississippiMan
(Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
To: KevinDavis
That is correct, who knows some store will overtake Walmart.. When I don't know... Maybe Wal-Mart will get broken off into several companies by anti-trust suits. Or Wal-Mart executives will decide, some day, that the company has expanded into too many areas to remain manageable and they will spin-off certain businesses. Or the "internet revolution" will really happen and someone will figure out a way to apply the Amazon model to regular retail.
No company is forever. Look at the auto industry, for example.
111
posted on
04/11/2005 12:51:47 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: Modernman; All
or look at the Personal Computer Industry when it first came out..
112
posted on
04/11/2005 12:53:47 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: evilthatmendo
i admit that i hate Walmart with a passion and i think it is truly evil with a capital E - so i have my own bias. but i think there are a lot of "conservatives" out there who really do only look at the rosy picture because anything that makes money is okay with them. i just don't believe money is the be all and end all of life, or the only value that we should regard, maintain, uphold or encourage. after all, jesus whipped the money lenders out of the temple. hope he does that again when he comes back.So, I take it that you are in agreement with the saying that "money is the root of all evil" and that Walmart is evil, at least partly because of that?
113
posted on
04/11/2005 12:55:43 PM PDT
by
70times7
(An open mind is a cesspool of thought)
To: Modernman
Wal-Mart might only exist in history books.
The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (A&P) and Montgomery Ward come to mind. Each of Sears, J.C. Penney, and Big K has approached meeting its eternal demise.
114
posted on
04/11/2005 1:06:30 PM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: Modernman
Wal-Mart will get broken off into several companies by anti-trust suits.
Spare us dubious antitrust suits! Please!
115
posted on
04/11/2005 1:09:07 PM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: The Great Yazoo
The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (A&P) and Montgomery Ward come to mind. Funny you should mention A&P. I was involved with some of their desperation financing a few years back. Hard to imagine that A&P used to be the biggest grocery chain in the US at one time.
They started going downhill when their management in the 50's decided against expanding their stores to also sell non-grocery items (such as lightbulbs and cleaning supplies). By the time they realized their mistake, it was too late.
116
posted on
04/11/2005 1:11:39 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: The Great Yazoo
Spare us dubious antitrust suits! Please! I'm certainly not advocating them.
117
posted on
04/11/2005 1:12:25 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: Straight Vermonter
I left Vermont right as Wal-Mart's last push for the Williston store began. I was kinda hoping it wouldn't fly, but if there's a market for it, so be it. I figured if people really didn't want it there, they would drive it out of business by not shopping there!
I don't know if it was a direct casualty, but I noticed on a visit a couple years ago that the Woolworth's in downtown Burlington closed. Something about the "five & dime" mystique and the lunch counter I found very comforting in an Americana way.
118
posted on
04/11/2005 1:32:05 PM PDT
by
Guvmint_Cheese
(Beware of virgin porcupines bearing antichrists...)
To: Pondman88
We should just make a law that forces Walmart to pay its workers 50 an hour. That would solve all these problems. I can't believe you wrote that without a sarcasm tag.
119
posted on
04/11/2005 1:38:14 PM PDT
by
LowOiL
("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
To: Rhoades
The question becomes: do we really need small, inefficient and expensive shops to supply us with our shaving cream and plastic laundry baskets? How vibrant is a downtown where such items are being hocked? Since Wal-Mart consolidates these kinds of goods into "big boxes," we, like John Blundell, can get them for dirt cheap all in one place. Charming downtown areas can then evolve into gorgeous window-shopping and restaurant-hopping districts for both locals and tourists. In the meantime, everyone knows where to go to get the bare necessities quickly and at a lower cost. This sums it up pretty well. Other stores can still compete effectively with Wal-Mart, by not taking them head-on. WM really doesn't have a huge selection in any particular area. They just have a lot of areas, and ensure low prices in those areas. If a competing store just specializes a little, catering to the more specific needs/tastes of local customers, for example, they will get business.
120
posted on
04/11/2005 1:46:18 PM PDT
by
TChris
(Just once, we need an elected official to stand up to a clearly incorrect ruling by a court. - Ann C)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson