Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sonny M
That's because it has a lot of exceptions for American industries and CA industries.
9 posted on 04/10/2005 2:17:04 PM PDT by sanchez810
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: sanchez810
That's because it has a lot of exceptions for American industries and CA industries.

I can understand that, but at 2,600 pages, this "thing" is not a free trade agreement, its some kind of entity that deals with trade, in some places, and protectionism in others, but a "free trade agreement" it is not, not by the definitions used by either free traders or protectionists.

I will be the first to admit, I have not read the agreement, but I would like to see any kind of future agreement, to be limited in size, simple in design, easy to understand for parties affected (either helped or hindered), and brief.

The kind of agreement, that does not require one to hire a lawyer to evaluate so it can be grasped, and where the reader or affected parties can draw their own conclusions to see if the agreement if beneficial or harmful to them.

10 posted on 04/10/2005 2:37:15 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: sanchez810
That's because it has a lot of exceptions for American industries and CA industries.

I can understand that, but at 2,600 pages, this "thing" is not a free trade agreement, its some kind of entity that deals with trade, in some places, and protectionism in others, but a "free trade agreement" it is not, not by the definitions used by either free traders or protectionists.

I will be the first to admit, I have not read the agreement, but I would like to see any kind of future agreement, to be limited in size, simple in design, easy to understand for parties affected (either helped or hindered), and brief.

The kind of agreement, that does not require one to hire a lawyer to evaluate so it can be grasped, and where the reader or affected parties can draw their own conclusions to see if the agreement if beneficial or harmful to them.

11 posted on 04/10/2005 2:38:41 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson