Sure - how much of the information in the article above is verifiable?
Aside from the Washington Post reference, that is, which refers to a now defunct islamist network, and not a going concern as implied by the Stratfor article.
Don't strain yourself trying to sort the hard info from the fluff, 'cause there is none - just because it's innuendo and BS that sounds nice to you is no reason to toss sanity aside, pythag: do that, and next thing you know you'll be making asinine comments about how Bosnians should cozy up to their buddies the Serbs, as if the 1990's never happened.
You should be more worried about what's going on in Kosovo, and how long you can maintain the illusion that it's going to remain a part of Serbia.
And how long can you hold onto the illusion that the Serb Army won't return to Kosovo to reclaim their territory? It's only a question of when it will happen.
In actuality, Rugova will survive a lot longer either under Serb or UN rule, if Kosovo becomes the KLA's personal internationally recognized sovereign criminal state that they aspire it to be, Rugova will have to start hunting for a convenient burial plot while the prices are still cheap.