To: yatros from flatwater
It really is more historically accurate to use BCE and CE, as the year count doesn't relate to any significant person's birth year. So, to reckon it as the start date of the common calendar or common era is not just politically correct, it's factual.
So what separates the "common era" from the period previous to that?????
To: 3dognight
> So what separates the "common era" from the period previous to that?????
People started keeping track with a common system.
15 posted on
04/08/2005 11:37:48 AM PDT by
orionblamblam
("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
To: 3dognight
You could co-opt the CE and BCE designations and turn them into "Before the Christian Era" and the "Christian Era."
Common just refers to the division between ancient and modern history.
44 posted on
04/08/2005 12:50:00 PM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
To: 3dognight
So what separates the "common era" from the period previous to that?????....Something about dinosaurs, comets and lots of ice?
47 posted on
04/08/2005 12:56:04 PM PDT by
Safetgiver
(Only two requisites to be a judge. Gray hair to look wise and hemmorhoids to look concerned.)
To: 3dognight
So what separates the "common era" from the period previous to that
A common reckoning of year dating, which is what COMMON ERA means. Yes, we all know some ignorant monk in the Second Century said "Jesus" was born in the year "1", but since then we have learned that was impossible, and more likely between 6 and 4 BCE (Herod died in 4 BCE). So the "AD" and "BC" are an ignorant measurement of nothing.
79 posted on
04/08/2005 2:54:32 PM PDT by
safisoft
(Give me Torah!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson