Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of Pope's Last Will and Testament
Associated Press ^ | April 7, 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 04/07/2005 8:55:52 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper

The following is an English translation of the official Vatican Italian translation of the text of Pope John Paul II's last will and testament, which was originally written in Polish with successive additions. Dates have been written according to European convention, which makes "6.3.1979" represent March 6, 1979.

The document begins with a Latin phrase that reads, "I am completely in Your hands," and follows with a citation from the New Testament.

The testament of 6.3.1979

Totus Tuus ego sum

In the Name of the Holiest Trinity. Amen.

"Keep watch, because you do not know which day when the Lord will come" - These words remind me of the final call, which will come the moment that the Lord will choose. I desire to follow Him and desire that all that is part of my earthly life shall prepare me for this moment. I do not know when it will come, but, like all else, this moment too I place into the hands of the Mother of My Master: Totus Tuus. In the same maternal hands I place All those with whom my life and vocation are bound. Into these Hands I leave above all the Church, and also my Nation and all humanity. I thank everyone. To everyone I ask forgiveness. I also ask prayers, so that the Mercy of God will loom greater than my weakness and unworthiness.

During spiritual exercises I reflected upon the testament of the Holy Father Paul VI. This study has led me to write the present testament.

I do not leave behind me any property which necessitates disposal. Regarding those items of daily use of which I made use, I ask that they be distributed as may appear opportune. My personal notes are to be burned. I ask that Don Stanislaw oversees this and thank him for the collaboration and help so prolonged over the years and so comprehensive. All other thanks, instead, I leave in my heart before God Himself, because it is difficult to express them.

Regarding the funeral, I repeat the same disposition given by the Holy Father Paul VI: Burial in the bare earth, not in a tomb, 13.3.92.

Apud Dominum misericordia et copiosa apud Eum redemptio

John Paul pp.II

Rome 6.3.1979

Following my death I ask for Holy Masses and prayers

5.3.1990

---

I express the deepest faith that, despite all my weakness, the Lord will accord me every necessary grace to face, according to His will, whatever task, trial and suffering that will be demanded of His servant, during the course of my life. I also have faith that never will it be permitted that, through my behavior: by words, actions or omissions, I betray my obligations in this holy seat of Peter.

---

24.II-1.III.1980

Also during these spiritual exercises I have reflected upon the truth of the Priesthood of Christ in the perspective of that Crossing which is for each one of us the moment of death. In taking leave of this world - to be born into the other, the future world, eloquent sign is for us the Resurrection of Christ.

I therefore read the copy of my testament of the last year, it also made during spiritual exercises - I compared it with the testament of my great Predecessor and Father Paul VI, with that sublime witness to the death of a Christian and of a pope - and I renewed in myself consciousness of the questions, to which refers the copy of 6.III.1979, prepared by me (in a rather provisional way).

Today I desire to add to it only this, that each one of us must keep in mind the prospect of death. And must be ready to present himself before the Lord and Judge - and contemporaneously Redeemer and Father. Then I too can take this into consideration continuously, entrusting that decisive moment to the Mother of Christ and of the Church - to the Mother of my hope.

The times in which we live are indescribably difficult and troubled. Difficult and tense has become the life of the Church as well, characteristic trial of these times - as much for the Faithful, as much as for the Pastors. In some Countries (as, e.g. in that one about which I was reading during the spiritual exercises), the Church finds itself in a period of persecution that is not inferior to those of the first centuries; on the contrary, the degree of cruelty and hatred is greater still. Sanguis martyrum - semen christianorum (Eds: Latin for "Blood of the martyrs - seeds of Christians"). And beyond this - so many people disappear innocently, even in this Country, in which we live...

I desire once more to entrust myself totally to the mercy of the Lord. He himself will decide when and how I must finish my earthly life and pastoral ministry. In life and in death Totus Tuus through the Immaculate. Accepting this death already, I hope that Christ will give me grace for my final passage, which is Easter. I hope too that it shall be made useful also for this important cause in which I am trying to serve: the salvation of men, the safeguarding of the human family and of all the nations and the peoples (among these I refer in particular to my earthly Country), useful for the persons who in a special way have entrusted to me for the questions of the Church, for the glory of God himself.

I do not desire to add anything to that which I wrote a year ago - only express this readiness and at the same time this faith, to which the present spiritual exercises prepared me.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jp2; jpii; lastwill; popejohnpaullii; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 541-545 next last
To: BigSkyFreeper
No, BigSkyFreeper, you apparently misread both our posts. I'm saying we should all study and discuss the scripture.
MineralMan brought up the standard of being a Bible scholar.
421 posted on 04/07/2005 12:47:01 PM PDT by Republican in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: CompSciGuy
[ Upon second reading of your awkward and clumsy rebuttal ]

It was not a rebuttal.. it was a canard..
You overlooked the Jews in the middle ages..
Who where treated as harshly as the "christians" by the RCC..
WHAT?... OH! it was the KINGS, that did IT...
check.. Well duuuh, on my part.. LoL..

422 posted on 04/07/2005 12:47:25 PM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

So I can't spell.

Scripture is clear that Christ's sacrifice was a one-time event. We were directed to remember it, not repeat it.


423 posted on 04/07/2005 12:49:21 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Just like BigSkyFreeper, you apparently misread both my post and MineralMan's post. I said we should study and discuss the scripture. MineralMan suggested that only Bible scholars are qualified to discuss scripture and then admitted that he's wasn't a Bible scholar
424 posted on 04/07/2005 12:50:35 PM PDT by Republican in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Jesus Christ is clear that we should "do this in remembrance of [Him]."


425 posted on 04/07/2005 12:51:11 PM PDT by Petronski (I thank God Almighty for a most remarkable blessing: John Paul the Great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

The more I try to understand this, the more non-sequitors I find.

How can distinct events be the same (as in a single thing, as opposed to duplication)?


426 posted on 04/07/2005 12:51:15 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Republican in CA; MineralMan
No, BigSkyFreeper, you apparently misread both our posts. I'm saying we should all study and discuss the scripture.

I agree. MineralMan simply stated he's no Bible scholar, and it doesn't require one to interpret the meaning of the Word.

427 posted on 04/07/2005 12:54:34 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Stupidity is also a gift of God, but one mustn't misuse it" - Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
How can distinct events be the same (as in a single thing, as opposed to duplication)?

#1, is God bound by time? Does He exist in or outside of time?

#2, If I get water out of a well today, and tomorrow get more water from it, is there one well or two?

SD

428 posted on 04/07/2005 12:54:50 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Combined with other things, which I clearly specified and which you deliberately left out.

What is prayer aside from communicating with a spiritual being? What makes talking to Christ/God prayer but talking to Mary not? How is "Hail Mary ..." not a prayer to Mary?

Stop bashing and start explaining. There are a lot of Protestants here trying to understand something, and we're just getting whacked with non-sequitors. Ain't helping.


429 posted on 04/07/2005 12:55:15 PM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

No it is not. During the Mass we are truly present at Calvary. It is the same sacrifice presented in perpetuity. In the Mass Jesus offers Himself in the form of Bread and Wine. "The Mass reminds us that there is no other means of salvation except in the cross of Christ. God wishes this continuation of Calvary's sacrifice so that the hymn of praise and thanksgiving that man owes to God may never cease. Man needs the continual help of the blood of the redeemer". Some of this I quoted from Mediator Dei by Pope Pius XII.


430 posted on 04/07/2005 12:56:00 PM PDT by lastchance (Life is sacred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: 1Peter3v14

To deny Mary's special relationship to Christ is to deny His humanity. The wedding feast at Cana should indicate how powerful she was with Him.


431 posted on 04/07/2005 12:56:02 PM PDT by wiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jamesissmall218
Veneration is respecting a person for their greatness. Worship is respecting, revering, or loving a divine being.

As I posted earlier, worship is also, "extreme devotion, intense love or admiration of any kind." The point I tried to make is that some Catholics respect Mary as an example of faith, most blessed of all women, and some Catholics hold such "extreme devotion, intense love and admiration" that they are actually worshipping her.
432 posted on 04/07/2005 12:59:10 PM PDT by Republican in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

Comment #433 Removed by Moderator

To: blinachka

Mary is the mother of Jesus in the flesh. She is in no way the mother of Jesus in his divinity.


John 10:30 I and my Father are one.

Notice he did not say I and my mother are one. If you are claiming Mary is the mother of God then that by definition places her in a position above GOD himself.



434 posted on 04/07/2005 1:05:05 PM PDT by The Lumster (Money for nuthin, speculation for free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: Republican in CA
As I posted earlier, worship is also, "extreme devotion, intense love or admiration of any kind." The point I tried to make is that some Catholics respect Mary as an example of faith, most blessed of all women, and some Catholics hold such "extreme devotion, intense love and admiration" that they are actually worshipping her.

So if I love Mary a whole, whole bunch, it turns her into a deity? That's quite subjective.

I prefer to think that devotion offered to humans is "veneration" and devition and sacrifice offered to diety is "worship."

SD

435 posted on 04/07/2005 1:05:51 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Bless you BigSkyFreeper. This is my last post about this. Following is what MineralMan actually wrote:

"Think about this, please: Are you competent to discuss these issues? Are you a full-time Biblical scholar? I'd be very careful not to put yourself in a position you can't defend.

As someone who has read the entire Bible half a dozen times cover to cover, and much of it many more times, I would not even begin to call myself a Biblical scholar. I can quote passages around the clock, but that does not make me a Biblical scholar, either.

I suspect that what you are doing here is regurgitating what someone else has told you, rather than passing on information based on your own scholarship."

He's asking if the poster was competent to discuss these issues. He is not saying that "it doesn't require one [a Bible scholar] to interpret the meaning of the Word."

But...at least you're writing in love and thinking the best of MineralMan as the scripture asks us to do.
436 posted on 04/07/2005 1:06:35 PM PDT by Republican in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: The Lumster
Mary is the mother of Jesus in the flesh. She is in no way the mother of Jesus in his divinity.

Where was Jesus' divinity while his "flesh" was in Mary's womb?

If Mary is not the mother of God either a) She is not Jesus' mother or b) Jesus is not God.

Which do you choose?

SD

437 posted on 04/07/2005 1:07:22 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Geez, you people are sooooo closed. Mary was sinless because God saved her at conception, therefore Jesus was her Savior!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! She was saved at her conception in order to be born sinless, Christ mother. I have stated on this thread till I am blue in the face, Jesus could NOT have been born from a sinful woman and lay in a sinful womb for 9 months.


438 posted on 04/07/2005 1:08:17 PM PDT by rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

"If I save you from falling into a hole, I am your "savior" just as much as if I had to lift you out of the hole."


You may be my saviour but you are not my God


You are playing word games here to avoid the obvious answer. Mary said MY GOD AND MY SAVIOUR - clearly implying her recognition that she needed a saviour in the spiritual sense


439 posted on 04/07/2005 1:08:17 PM PDT by The Lumster (Money for nuthin, speculation for free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

It's not subjective, it's the definition of worship: loving something a whole, whole bunch. That's a big issue in our lives. We can make "deities" out of money, worldly success, looks, another person, you name it. We must love God above all things, and it's easy to slip up.


440 posted on 04/07/2005 1:09:10 PM PDT by Republican in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 541-545 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson