Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
[By a two-to-one (44% to 24%) margin, with one-in-three (32%) undecided, the survey finds that an incapacitated person should be presumed to want to live in the absence of written instructions such as a “living will.” ]





By a strange coincidence, that is exactly what THE LAW requires of health care providers (except in Florida now that a judge has decided to create a legal precedent to ignore the law).
19 posted on 04/06/2005 9:10:19 PM PDT by spinestein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: spinestein; FairOpinion
"...except in Florida now that a judge has decided to create a legal precedent..."

I didn't post a complete quote, but this portion of what you wrote should give us all pause. Much of what passes for "rule of law" in this country is based not on legislation and statute, but on legal precedent. This entire ruling needs to be overturned, lest it is cited in future euthanasia/murder-of-the-disabled cases as "precedent."

48 posted on 04/07/2005 6:05:26 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson