To: johnny7
Yo, Jennifer - Your article is a thesis built on a steaming pile of crap. First, her HUSBAND, with whom she was living at the time of her "collapse", was her "close relative" that should have noticed any signs of an eating disorder. Second, you need to demonstrate that it is feasible, plausible, and probable that she was anorexic before blaming her "collapse" on that disorder. Third, you don't even catch a whiff of the irony in your assertion that Terri was starved to death because she was anorexic.
Pathetic.
18 posted on
04/06/2005 5:28:17 AM PDT by
MortMan
(CON is the opposite of PRO. Is Congress therefore the opposite of progress?)
To: MortMan
Most relatives of bulimics don't catch on to the bulimic behavior for years. Bulimics can be pretty crafty about hiding their disorder. I do believe she had some kind of eating disorder.
I do find it ironic that she was starved to death, however.
To: MortMan
First, her HUSBAND, with whom she was living at the time of her "collapse", was her "close relative" that should have noticed any signs of an eating disorder.
And, according to the MSM, he would be the only one to have any RIGHT to intervene. Heck, with all the speculation, I'm equally free to speculate that the parents DID say something to Terry and she ignored it - or that she had no eating disorder at all.
No, on second thought, she did have ONE eating disorder - that of being unable to stop people from starving her.
155 posted on
04/06/2005 11:31:22 AM PDT by
beezdotcom
(I'm usually either right or wrong...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson