Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave
But it doesn't say "only Scripture" is useful. I know you wish it did, but it doesn't. Doesn't the man of God need faith and grace, among other things?

I agree that it doesn't say that only Scripture is useful. But that is not what Sola Scriptura represents. Sola Scriptura means that the Scripture is the only infallible rule of faith. It doesn't say that there are not other, fallible rules of faith or teaching, or even traditions that we can refer to and learn from. But these are all by definition inferior to and subject to correction by the Scriptures, because the Scriptures are God-breathed. Being God-breathed, the Scriptures are the very speaking of God and are therefore the highest authority.

I also agree that the man of God needs faith and grace. But suppose the man of God wants to know what God says about these things? I refer you again to the counsel of Cyril of Jerusalem, who as all the Church Fathers did, said:

Do not then believe me because I tell thee these things, unless thou receive from the Holy Scriptures the proof of what is set forth: for this salvation, which is of our faith, is not by ingenious reasonings, but by proof from the Holy Scriptures ... For the Articles of the Faith were not composed at the good pleasure of men: but the most important points chosen from all Scriptures, make up the one teaching of the Faith. And, as the mustard seed in a little grain contains many branches, thus also this Faith, in a few words, hath enfolded in its bosom the whole knowledge of godliness contained both in the Old and New Testaments.

Cordially,

595 posted on 04/07/2005 1:13:16 PM PDT by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies ]


To: Diamond
I agree that it doesn't say that only Scripture is useful.

Then it's not a "proof text" for Sola Scriptura, and I wish it would stop being used as if it were.

But suppose the man of God wants to know what God says about these things? I refer you again to the counsel of Cyril of Jerusalem, who as all the Church Fathers did, said:

I don't really have a problem with this. The problem is with those who will only accept "bumper sticker" theology rather than:

And, as the mustard seed in a little grain contains many branches, thus also this Faith, in a few words, hath enfolded in its bosom the whole knowledge of godliness contained both in the Old and New Testaments.

Even as we speak, I am battling Nestorians on another thread. Others refuse truths about the Trinity bceause they can't find it explicitly laid out in Scripture.

At some point, if one is going to go deep into theology one either needs to work through the mental exercises, or remain silent.

(Please, don't take that personally. You have always seem well-studied. It is not you I am complaining about.)

SD

597 posted on 04/07/2005 2:20:18 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]

To: Diamond

You make some great points!


615 posted on 04/07/2005 9:09:33 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson