Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: loborojo
We have gun accidents involving young children and it is the same thing. The owner of these dogs is responsible because they did not take the necessary precautions to avoid such a tragedy.
14 posted on 04/05/2005 6:38:06 AM PDT by matymac (I'm saved...are you...?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: matymac
We have gun accidents involving young children and it is the same thing. The owner of these dogs is responsible because they did not take the necessary precautions to avoid such a tragedy.

The difference between a gun and a pit bull is that the gun doesn't suddenly leap out of the closet and chase down its owners.

The owners are fully responsible because they chose to take a risk by owning dogs known to be unpredictable and violent. There's no excuse.

Guns are predictable. Animals are not.
77 posted on 04/05/2005 7:24:09 AM PDT by halieus (God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: matymac
The owner of these dogs is responsible because they did not take the necessary precautions to avoid such a tragedy.

Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!

No sane person would leave a loaded gun laying around. The dogs were apparently left at the former residence to guard it, (my conclusion--pets would have moved to the new place right away, imo), and guard it they did, against even the owners' own child. Anyone wandering in there would have been fair game for the dogs.

147 posted on 04/05/2005 8:19:20 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Repeal the NFA of '34! the GCA of '68! and the '86 ban!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson