Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hi Heels

"What is this? You vote, it passes, they change it anyway...."

I do not agree that they changed anything. The vote was defining marriage as man and woman, the case was in regards to "same-sex partnership rights". Now, they clearly will not win this battle in California with so many liberal judges. I do not know a solution


11 posted on 04/04/2005 3:18:49 PM PDT by DollarCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DollarCoins
"Their argument centered on a proposition approved by California voters in 2000 that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. "

This is the part I felt they were "changing". Not that it's held any water.

12 posted on 04/04/2005 3:25:05 PM PDT by Hi Heels ("Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" H.M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson