Protect an employee from his employer? Why should we?
Turn it around. Imagine a pro-life drug chain that refuses to allow any of its stores to sell RU-486. Now imagine that one pharmacist deliberately disobeys his employer by stocking and selling RU-486.
Should that pharmacist also be "protected" from his employer? Or shouldn't we allow the business owner control over his own business... There's a word for that... What is it again? Ah, yes. Capitalism.
I have suggest all along that this law may go to far. I have not advocated that, but I do believe in protecting Pharmasists from frivolous ACLU lawsuits.